This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
- To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: Mistaken change in GCC (fwd)
- From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 21:33:37 +0100
- Cc: Neil Booth <neilb at earthling dot net>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, rms at gnu dot org, zackw at stanford dot edu, gerd at gnu dot org, pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at, Joe Buck <jbuck at racerx dot synopsys dot com>
- References: <20001122184332.A29542@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <200011222013.eAMKDnP04082@tantra.cygnus.co.uk>
- Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 08:13:49PM +0000, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> > > (2) Use a gcc-2 version of cccp.c (and other files, including cexp.y)
> > > for tradcpp.c. That does bloat the compiler distribution a bit, and
> > > I guess it is more work than just dropping it in.
> >
> > I don't think any of us really wants this.
>
> It sounds like the safest way to get full feature compatibility to the
> latest version that used cccp.c for -traditional, though.
> Who knows what people will miss next in tradcpp.c .
I also think it would be better to use cccp.c from March or when switch to
cpplib happened because that would mean less work than re-adding all the
features people will moan about (such as GNU varargs extensions etc).
Jakub