This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists
- To: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at
- Subject: Re: Moving the libstdc++ lists
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2000 16:27:31 -0800
- Cc: libstdc++ at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.30.0011170029090.68795-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:
Gerald> Okay, now that Phil and I approach the finishing line
Gerald> concerning the web pages, we should also consider moving
Gerald> the libstdc++ lists.
Gerald> How do we want to do that? Move all three lists mentioned
Gerald> in http://sources.redhat.com/libstdc++/mail.html namely
Gerald> libstdc++@sources.redhat.com
Gerald> libstdc++-cvs@sources.redhat.com
Gerald> libstdc++-prs@sources.redhat.com from
Gerald> listname@sources.redhat.com to listname@gcc.gnu.org?
Gerald> Are -cvs and -prs still needed?
I don't think so.
I would actually drop the libstdc++ list, as well -- but there has
been a strong preference from those folks to keep that list.
Gerald> And if we keep all three lists, we should probably also
Gerald> should think (and document) the roles of the various
Gerald> lists: Where should bootstrap failures related to
Gerald> libstdc++ go? gcc-bugs?
Yes, in my opinion.
And shouldn't all patches also be
Gerald> sent to gcc-patches? ...
Yes, definitely.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com