This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: zack's todo list
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: zack's todo list
- From: law at redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 09:45:46 -0700
- cc: neilb at earthling dot net, zackw at stanford dot edu, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at redhat dot com
In message <20001113130938Q.email@example.com>you write:
> I think that the performance of the non-integrated CPP is not
> important for 3.0.
> It is important, in fact, only that the total time
> taken by `gcc -c foo.c' be comparable to 2.95; we can choose to speed
> up any part of the compiler to accomplish that. In other words, if
> cpp is slower, and the compiler is faster that is OK.
> What would be nice would be if CPP were faster, and since integrated,
> even faster, allowing us some slop for slowdowns in the compiler