This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

To: aoliva at redhat dot com
Subject: Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
From: Richard Stallman <rms at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 00:21:17 -0700 (MST)
CC: dewar at gnat dot com, dstarner98 at aasaa dot ofe dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, guerby at acm dot org, kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, law at redhat dot com
References: <20001105162359.C7C8F34D82@nile.gnat.com><200011120900.CAA19349@wijiji.santafe.edu> <orr94hjqii.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Reply-to: rms at gnu dot org

    Since we're talking about names, I think it's only fair to point out
    that the name of the company is Red Hat, not Redhat or RedHat.

Thank you.

References:
- Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
  - From: Richard Stallman
- Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
  - From: Alexandre Oliva

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]