This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[NeilB@earthling.net: Re: HTML page for tree.def]
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: [NeilB@earthling.net: Re: HTML page for tree.def]
- From: Neil Booth <NeilB at earthling dot net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 23:14:16 +0000
----- Forwarded message from Neil Booth <NeilB@earthling.net> -----
Subject: Re: HTML page for tree.def
From: Neil Booth <NeilB@earthling.net>
To: Bill Wendling <wendling@ncsa.uiuc.edu>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 22:49:11 +0000
Hi Bill,
I certainly think it's useful, and would support putting it somewhere
on the main site once you've completed it, if that's acceptable to
you. Dunno what others think, though.
I've been thinking of writing a brief document, maybe in tex or
texinfo format, about internals of cpplib. Hopefully this would make
it easier for others to chip in, though I don't think cpplib is
anywhere near as intimidating as the compiler proper. There are
various things that could trip people up and should be documented
properly, though. Is this a good idea?
Neil.
Bill Wendling wrote:-
> I've started work on trying to convert the very nicely commented, but
> intimidating tree.def file into an easy-to-view/search web page. It's not
> complete, but has a number of the Symbol types finished already. Please
> take a look at it and give feedback in your copious spare time (haha).
> The page is up at:
>
> http://ganymede.isdn.uiuc.edu/~wendling/tree.html
>
> The formatting isn't complete yet, but does give a general idea of what I
> think would make a good format for the information.
>
> Obviously, much more information will be needed (hyperlinks to other
> pages, etc.).
>
> I haven't checked out other people's documentation on this subject. One
> of the reasons I'm doing this is to become more familiar with the GCC
> code so that I can contribute things in an intelligent manner.
>
> Share and enjoy!
----- End forwarded message -----