This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: shared libg2c?

To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
Subject: Re: shared libg2c?
From: nbecker at fred dot net
Date: 30 Oct 2000 15:40:32 -0500
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <x88y9z6xtls.fsf@adglinux1.hns.com><39FDCF4D.92E16BD3@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>

>>>>> "Toon" == Toon Moene <toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl> writes:

    Toon> nbecker@fred.net wrote:
    >> I suggest libgc2 be installed shared as well as archive, where
    >> supported.

    Toon> Note that for libg2c being installed shared *usefully* first of all the
    Toon> code has to be made reentrant.

I don't understand.  Could you please elaborate?  Specifically, why is
it useful to have a non-reentrant archive lib, but it's not useful if
it's compiled as a shared lib?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: shared libg2c?
  - From: Toon Moene

References:
- shared libg2c?
  - From: nbecker
- Re: shared libg2c?
  - From: Toon Moene

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]