This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Chill


>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:

    Robert> wouldn't it work to simply provide dummy implementations
    Robert> of the obstack mechanism that did nothing at all (I am not
    Robert> particularly arguing for retaining Chill, just asking the
    Robert> question).

Some of the tests for which mechanism you are using are on the
critical path, so these want to go.

In addition, not freeing the memory at all will make the compiler
unusable for all but very small programs.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]