This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: multiple defintions error
- To: amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk, atif at viewinternet dot com dot sg
- Subject: Re: multiple defintions error
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 16:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, johnydog at go dot cz
> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 17:03:40 +0800 (SGT)
> From: Atif Shahab <atif@viewinternet.com.sg>
> To: Joern Rennecke <amylaar@cygnus.co.uk>
> Ok, now I'm confused. I'll explain my understanding and can anyone point
> out the mistake.
> Now assuming that all the functions are inlined at compile time,
This is an asusmption that is not always true, while you can make it,
you cannot talk about the complete set of effects doing something has.
His comment I suspect was talking about exactly the case you ignore,
and roughly speaking, only that case.