This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Varargs macros subtly broken

To: Neil Booth <NeilB at earthling dot net>
Subject: Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
From: Jamie Lokier <egcs at tantalophile dot demon dot co dot uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 19:15:13 +0200
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Zack Weinberg <zack at rabi dot columbia dot edu>
References: <20000918120419.C17692@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000919180308.A7018@napalm.go.cz> <20000919191221.A20462@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000919214025.A30587@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20000919214320.A30677@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20000920175206.A31338@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000920172728.A17616@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20000925215143.A16833@pcep-jamie.cern.ch> <20000925222224.B24101@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> <20000926001457.A12405@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>

Neil Booth wrote:
> Here's a fix.  It's doesn't fix the deeply nested varargs mess, but
> plugs the counting bug.  Macro expansion needs to be simplified, but
> really needs token lookahead first.
> 
> Bootstraps and passes CPP tests.

Passes my gnu_count & c99_count tests too.

-- Jamie

References:
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Jan Dvorak
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Jamie Lokier
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Neil Booth
- Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
  - From: Jamie Lokier

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]