This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck.
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Subject: Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck.
- From: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey at switchco dot com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 13:55:17 -0400
- CC: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- References: <200009251744.NAA08728@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com>
I compiled everything with a 'make bootstrap' which builds the
libraries as well. That's very odd that the 2.95 would have worked,
then. I presume I was building 2.96 with the 2.95 compiler but then
shouldn't the bootstrapped 2.96 be building the standard libraries? Do I
need to build everything again *after* performing a 'make install' on
the 2.96?
thanx & later,
Ben Scherrey
David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> Did you compile the libraries with gcc-2.95 or CVS gcc-2.96? The
> C++ name mangling has changed, so the compiler version used to build the
> library needs to match the compiler version building an application.
>
> David