This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, cgd at sibyte dot com
- Subject: Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
- From: Brad Lucier <lucier at math dot purdue dot edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:54:02 -0500 (EST)
- Cc: lucier at math dot purdue dot edu (Brad Lucier)
Chris G. Demetriou wrote:
> If there's some bad style that you really want to force people to fix
> (e.g. bad parenthesization) that's one thing, but spurious warnings
> cause by compiler confusion are Really Bad and make many people's
> lives harder.
>
> (This post, plus something I saw earlier about adding warnings if the
> compiler can't invoke certain optimizations because of complexity,
> made me feel inclined to pipe up about this.)
Well, as the person who proposed the -Wdisabled-optimization
warning, let me say that I'm proposing that it *not* be invoked
by any "group" warning flag like -Wall. You don't claim that
it is, but readers might (reasonably, but falsely) infer that
from what you wrote.
I'd just like to have this optimization information so I can change the
generated C code I'm handing to gcc if I have to.
Brad Lucier