This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Subject: Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 10:26:36 -0600
- cc: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>, Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, Joe Buck <jbuck at racerx dot synopsys dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009130740070.67582-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.a
t>you write:
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Personally, I think we ought to immediately nuke all the ports that
> > were never updated from gcc 1.x, and that have been commented out in
> > the configure file since gcc 2.0.
> >
> > Namely: fx80, ns32k-ns-genix, pyramid, tahoe, gmicro.
> >
> > There are plenty of others that are also obsolete, but those named
> > have had many multiples of years completely and obviously not compiled.
>
> I second this.
>
> How about announcing this plan to gcc-announce and, unless there are
> significant and founded objections, nuke the part after, say, 3 weeks?
Let's add the spur chip to the list above and make the announcement/request.
Other opinions?
jeff