This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
- From: Marc Espie <espie at quatramaran dot ens dot fr>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 21:10:28 +0200
- Organization: Ecole Normale Superieure (quatramaran)
- References: <200007250811.DAA35595@latour.rsch.comm.mot.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009021957530.89194-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <200009031533.RAA10148@quatramaran.ens.fr> <espie@quatramaran.ens.fr> <E13Vcfl-0001M0-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
In article <20000903111111.A8315@lucon.org> you write:
>On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 05:31:09PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
>> >>FWIW, as far as I know, binutils 2.10 is too old and so many bugs
>> >>have been fixed since then.
>> >Here's hoping that binutils next release won't have to wait for another
>> >three years...
>> My plan is to make 2.10.1 in a few weeks, and 2.11 at the end of the year.
>> If H.J can be more specific about which bugs he is having trouble
>with, we can
>> consider including the fixes in 2.10.1.
>All ELF and Linux related bug fixes are important to Linux. On the
>other hand, it takes me much less time to fix the current CVS than
>backport all those patches to 2.10. Please don't do it for Linux. We
>have to use the one based on the current sourceware.
Please do it for other platforms. Not every system has an over-eager
H.J.Lu churning bug-fixed after bug-fixed release of binutils...