gcc archive
date index for September, 2000

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 2000
17:10 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z. Geoff Keating
16:06 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Geoff Keating
15:55 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Mike Stump
15:44 Re: egcs-20000925 code generation bug Richard Henderson
14:04 egcs-20000925 code generation bug Richard Zidlicky
09:52 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Mark Mitchell
05:26 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Robert Dewar

September 29, 2000
23:45 Re: [c++] builtin functions and namespaces brent
19:14 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? brent
19:10 gcc and VCG Marcio de Oliveira Buss
19:01 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? brent
18:15 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Phil Edwards
15:31 Building GCC on Mac OS X Rob Emanuele
14:40 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? brent
14:29 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Geoff Keating
14:27 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Mike Stump
14:07 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Mike Stump
14:03 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? brent
13:37 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z. Geoff Keating
13:34 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? Phil Edwards
13:01 hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap? brent
12:55 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z. David Edelsohn
12:15 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z. Jan Hubicka
09:48 gperf 2.7.2 is released Bruno Haible
09:30 Re: g++ missing warning Robert Dewar

September 28, 2000
23:12 Re: Slight oddness with new preproc Neil Booth
21:29 Extra Money From The Comfort of Your Own Home ucansucceed2
20:00 Re: multiple defintions error Atif Shahab
19:13 warning: value computed is not used Byron Stanoszek
16:58 Re: multiple defintions error Mike Stump
16:21 Slight oddness with new preproc Donn Terry
12:57 Looking to join a resource group Parham, Beronica J
12:03 g++ missing warning nbecker
11:31 Re: Status of new C++ abi Toon Moene
07:15 Re: GCC und GNUEmacs Tim Prince
02:32 GCC und GNUEmacs Angela Kreikemeier
01:55 Re: multiple defintions error Atif Shahab

September 27, 2000
23:50 Re: Recent change in the way options are given to cpp Olivier Hainque
21:52 LOG_LINKS in the gcc Marcio de Oliveira Buss
21:35 Re: Status of new C++ abi Zack Weinberg
11:09 Re: Recent change in the way options are given to cpp Neil Booth
09:03 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
07:40 PRs vanishing from database Joseph S. Myers
07:14 Lots of new errors in make check on alpha Christian Iseli
04:48 Re: assembly optimizations... Jakub Jelinek
04:36 Re: assembly optimizations... Jamie Lokier
03:08 gcc problem ceritandogan
01:10 Recent change in the way options are given to cpp Olivier Hainque
00:42 assembly optimizations... tranx nouvel

September 26, 2000
23:18 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Neil Booth
20:36 Re: Status of new C++ abi Mark Mitchell
19:59 Status of new C++ abi Zack Weinberg
19:53 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config Richard Henderson
16:41 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
15:40 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config Marc Espie
15:21 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Neil Booth
14:11 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config Richard Henderson
13:55 Re: Bogus alpha config files ? Richard Henderson
12:56 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Laurent Guerby
12:28 Re: stale CVS lock? Jim Wilson
12:27 Re: FORTRAN pointer Toon Moene
12:17 stale CVS lock? David Edelsohn
10:24 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
10:21 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes Neil Booth
10:18 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Neil Booth
10:15 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
10:15 FORTRAN pointer Allen Barnett
10:13 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Neil Booth
09:31 Re: gcc download tprinceusa
09:01 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Benjamin Kosnik
08:47 gcc download Nathan Never
08:29 Re: multiple defintions error Joern Rennecke
04:37 Re: Pathalogical divides Jamie Lokier
04:36 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Jamie Lokier
04:15 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes Jamie Lokier
03:57 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
03:43 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jamie Lokier
03:06 Re: pow(),cos() .... brent verner
02:58 pow(),cos() .... Alex Kononov
01:29 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Andreas Schwab

September 25, 2000
23:55 Problem while installing GCC 2.95.2 T, Anuradha (Anuradha)
23:47 RE: load_multiple for argument push!? Kazu Hirata
22:43 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Zack Weinberg
22:05 RE: gcc-ss-20000925 is now available David Ronis
17:28 Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Robert Dewar
16:52 gcc-ss-20000925 is now available law
16:46 Re: FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS tprinceusa
16:39 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Joern Rennecke
16:33 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Joern Rennecke
15:53 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Neil Booth
15:34 long long and __extension__ on hpux Arne Sorli
15:18 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Joern Rennecke
15:12 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Joern Rennecke
14:34 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Joern Rennecke
14:30 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken Neil Booth
14:29 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes Neil Booth
14:28 Re: load_multiple for argument push!? Joern Rennecke
14:27 Re: Pathalogical divides Geoff Keating
14:10 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Neil Booth
13:45 Re: C++ front end Mark Mitchell
13:29 C++ front end Abani, Priya
13:26 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes Jamie Lokier
12:59 CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes Jamie Lokier
12:52 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jamie Lokier
12:36 $B%"%$!&%F%#!<!&%j%s%/2q0wJg=8$N$*CN$i$;(B info
12:30 Re: FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS Toon Moene
12:04 Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck. Benjamin Kosnik
11:51 Re: Database printing routine Mike Stump
11:32 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Phil Edwards
11:25 Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck. Benjamin Scherrey
11:13 Re: fixincl on linux systems Andi Kleen
11:01 Re: fixincl on linux systems Bruce Korb
10:43 Re: fixincl on linux systems Andi Kleen
10:42 Linking problems in latest cvs deck. Benjamin Scherrey
10:20 Re: fixincl on linux systems Bruce Korb
10:01 FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS Bob Kuhn
09:43 Varargs macros subtly broken Jamie Lokier
09:41 New template class of Matrix and Etc amal Burman
09:26 New C/C++ header for gnu C/C++ compiler Web House
08:46 Database printing routine Robertson, David
08:25 Re: that PATCH for gcc 2.95 branch Jeffrey A Law
08:03 Re: multiple defintions error Jan Dvorak
07:29 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Mark Mitchell
07:08 gcc/gdb contracting? Paul Kinzelman
06:57 Re: Pathalogical divides Robert Dewar
06:53 Re: Pathalogical divides Alexandre Oliva
05:19 Re: Pathalogical divides Robert Dewar
04:03 Re: multiple defintions error Atif Shahab
02:59 Re: multiple defintions error Jan Dvorak
02:43 Re: Pathalogical divides Richard Kenner
02:35 Re: Pathalogical divides Robert Dewar
02:04 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Akim Demaille
01:09 multiple defintions error Atif Shahab

September 24, 2000
23:46 Re: BUG: %lc in printf fails Ulrich Drepper
23:43 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Mark Mitchell
23:29 Re: Pathalogical divides Geoff Keating
23:04 Re: long long long Geoff Keating
22:57 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Geoff Keating
22:53 Re: Pathalogical divides Geoff Keating
17:40 that PATCH for gcc 2.95 branch Marc Espie
17:14 Re: macros with traditional cpp Zack Weinberg
14:18 Re: macros with traditional cpp Richard Henderson
14:12 [NeilB@earthling.net: Re: macros with traditional cpp] Neil Booth
13:57 Re: macros with traditional cpp Richard Henderson
13:57 Re: macros with traditional cpp Jamie Lokier
12:48 macros with traditional cpp Philip Blundell

September 23, 2000
17:05 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Phil Edwards
17:00 The old READMEs Joseph S. Myers
15:08 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Zack Weinberg
13:38 Re: Pathalogical divides Jeffrey A Law
13:38 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap Jeffrey A Law
13:31 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Markus Kuhn
12:33 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Joseph S. Myers
12:22 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Martin v. Loewis
11:33 Re: long long long Toon Moene
10:25 Re: BUG: %lc in printf fails Joseph S. Myers
10:02 BUG: %lc in printf fails Markus Kuhn
09:35 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported) Markus Kuhn
08:53 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 H . J . Lu
06:02 fixincl on linux systems Andi Kleen
02:31 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
00:07 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Martin Buchholz

September 22, 2000
23:38 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Martin Buchholz
21:44 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Mark Mitchell
21:00 Re: g++ on Dec Alpha llewelly
20:57 Re: initialization of non-const reference llewelly
18:21 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Stan Shebs
18:14 Re: long long long Richard Kenner
17:51 Re: long long long Mike Stump
17:14 long long long Tim Josling
17:00 Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Tim Josling
13:33 Re: GNU long long Joseph S. Myers
12:56 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Mike Stump
12:27 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap Phil Edwards
11:59 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap Alexandre Oliva
11:07 Register? Tod Thomas
10:56 Re: Question about a varasm change Jason Merrill
10:52 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Laurent Guerby
10:22 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Tim Hollebeek
10:22 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Gabriel Dos Reis
09:50 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' David Edelsohn
09:41 GNU long long Matt Minnis
09:33 gcc-2.95.2 on system mips-sni-sysv4 Krakowczyk, Andreas
09:32 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Richard Kenner
08:23 initialization of non-const reference Sjoerd Adema
08:13 Symbol collisions with g77 flynn
07:38 g++ on Dec Alpha Andreas Schultz
06:17 Re: bug in emit_move_insn_1 ? Denis Chertykov
04:51 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
02:15 Re: enquiry Erik Mouw
02:02 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Erik Mouw
01:45 Re: Pathalogical divides Andreas Schwab
01:44 Re: bug report ? Gerald Pfeifer
01:24 Re: thread_jumps does nothing for ix86 Greg McGary
00:48 bug report ? Ulrich Lauther
00:46 thread_jumps does nothing for ix86 Greg McGary
00:29 Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x' Mark Mitchell

September 21, 2000
23:55 Re: status? Mark Mitchell
23:32 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Magnus Fromreide
20:54 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Brad Lucier
20:26 enquiry Adarsh MP
19:25 status? nbecker
19:17 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Zack Weinberg
17:59 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Chris G. Demetriou
17:44 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Marc Espie
17:40 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Marc Espie
17:31 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Martin Buchholz
17:12 Re: bug in a29k-coff Richard Kenner
17:08 Re: Question: dynamic libraries? Paul Schulz
15:21 Re: Question: dynamic libraries? H . J . Lu
14:57 Question: dynamic libraries? Alejandro Arredondo
14:46 bug in a29k-coff Joel Sherrill
14:37 Re: porting Joe Buck
14:28 Re: Question about a varasm change Jason Merrill
14:22 Re: RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes llewelly
13:03 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Kamil Iskra
12:12 Pathalogical divides Richard Kenner
11:59 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
11:56 -B${prefix} during bootstrap Phil Edwards
08:42 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Koundinya.K
06:18 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Tim Prince
03:03 porting Stu Meikle
02:59 load_multiple for argument push!? Kazu Hirata
01:56 mips-sgi-irix5.2 Jean-Marc Nuzillard
00:35 Re: RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes Greg McGary

September 20, 2000
18:22 RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes Greg McGary
17:24 Re: First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ? Paul Duffy
17:02 Re: First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ? Jan Dvorak
16:45 First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ? Paul Duffy
15:20 Re: Trailing underscores needed Toon Moene
14:23 mailing list Ray Samborsky
14:02 Re: Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler Mike Stump
13:59 Trailing underscores needed Drcadmando
13:16 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
12:52 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Kosnik
12:29 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
12:01 Re: Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler Jan Dvorak
11:35 Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler Srini Eravelli
11:01 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Mike Stump
10:18 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Kosnik
09:48 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Phil Edwards
09:38 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Neil Booth
09:33 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Steven King
09:14 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
08:54 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 H . J . Lu
08:52 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jamie Lokier
08:42 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Theodore Papadopoulo
08:32 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Joe Buck
08:24 Re: link errors using latest snapshot markh
08:16 link errors using the latest snapshot markh
06:12 Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8 Gerald Pfeifer
05:29 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
03:52 Bogus alpha config files ? Marc Espie
01:39 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Theodore Papadopoulo

September 19, 2000
23:11 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Kosnik
23:01 problem installing gcc 2.95.2 on m68k-coff (fwd) Meir Hacohen
18:42 Inline function structure vs. address passing Dennis Ferguson
15:08 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Theodore Papadopoulo
13:34 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
13:16 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
13:09 Probably multilib -m64 problem: f77 correctness on Sparc Toon Moene
11:44 Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Benjamin Scherrey
11:44 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jan Dvorak
11:19 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
11:17 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
10:32 Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config Marc Espie
10:25 Re: Java and zlib Richard Henderson
10:23 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Jamie Lokier
10:23 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Richard Henderson
10:16 [MDavies@acclaimstudios.co.uk: RE: [Algorithms] A word to the wise] Michael Vance
10:13 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jamie Lokier
10:10 Re: External or local SYMBOL_REF? lars brinkhoff
09:28 zlib broken in CVS Jamie Lokier
09:09 Re: Help with gcc to assembler compilation Jan Dvorak
09:05 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jan Dvorak
08:51 Re: GCC + Unixware 7.0.1 Robert Lipe
08:42 Help with gcc to assembler compilation Yaaqov Karp
08:34 Re: Question about a varasm change Bernd Schmidt
08:14 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
08:01 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint David Howells
07:45 Re: Java and zlib Franz Sirl
07:41 Re: Java and zlib Gerald Pfeifer
07:32 Re: Java and zlib Daniel Berlin
07:27 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
07:21 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
07:11 Java and zlib Gerald Pfeifer
01:41 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Jamie Lokier

September 18, 2000
23:29 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96... Benjamin Scherrey
23:15 GCC + Unixware 7.0.1 a.walter
23:02 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? jfm2
22:27 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html Mark Mitchell
18:38 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
18:07 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
17:17 Re: Compilation time/date Mike Stump
16:55 gcc-ss-20000918 is now available law
16:53 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint John Wehle
15:59 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
15:40 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Linus Torvalds
15:38 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Stan Shebs
15:35 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Andrea Arcangeli
15:26 Compilation time/date Ovanes Manucharyan
14:44 Re: 128-bit integers and intmax_t Geoff Keating
14:39 Re: Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...Repost.. Don Mies
14:25 -Wtraditional, integer constants and C99 Joseph S. Myers
14:14 128-bit integers and intmax_t Joseph S. Myers
13:52 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling Richard Kenner
13:50 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling Geoff Keating
13:25 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Geoff Keating
13:12 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
13:07 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? reedkotler
11:59 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Brad Lucier
11:06 Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...Repost... Don Mies
11:02 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html Eric Lemings
09:52 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Alexandre Oliva
09:49 RE: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
09:45 RE: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? William Gacquer
09:32 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Richard Kenner
09:18 Re: compile/920501-18.c and -fssa Brad Lucier
09:13 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Alexandre Oliva
08:34 Re: Question about a varasm change Jeffrey A Law
08:23 Why not gnat Ada in gcc? Gene Montgomery
07:01 (C and C++:) conditional (?:) type balancing wrt comma op and 0 denoting null Marco Franzen
06:05 Re: External or local SYMBOL_REF? Joern Rennecke
03:04 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jamie Lokier
02:32 Re: Question about a varasm change Bernd Schmidt
02:06 Re: 64-bit GCC for Sparc Solaris... Alexandre Oliva
01:35 Re: ANSI C compiler required to build GCC from CVS? Alexandre Oliva
01:33 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96... Alexandre Oliva
01:04 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96... llewelly
00:24 Re: Question about a varasm change Jason Merrill
00:03 64-bit GCC for Sparc Solaris... Peter R. Torpman

September 17, 2000
23:29 Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96... Benjamin Scherrey
22:48 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. H . J . Lu
22:19 ANSI C compiler required to build GCC from CVS? Albert Chin-A-Young
22:09 Re: Question about very old patch Geoff Keating
17:16 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling Richard Kenner
16:45 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Alexandre Oliva
16:26 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Richard Henderson
16:12 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?) Jan Dvorak
15:53 warning: multi-line comment (why?) Craig Rodrigues
14:43 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Henderson
14:39 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Kenner
14:24 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Henderson
14:18 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Toon Moene
13:59 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Kenner
12:53 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Henderson
11:13 Re: Question about very old patch H . J . Lu
10:39 Re: Question about very old patch Gerald Pfeifer
10:30 Re: compile/920501-18.c and -fssa Mark Mitchell
10:08 Re: Question about very old patch H . J . Lu
07:17 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2 Erik Mouw
07:11 Problem with alpha.c:print_operand Richard Kenner
06:56 Problem with execute/20000801-1.c on Alpha Richard Kenner
06:22 Question about very old patch Marc Espie
05:20 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap" Laurynas Biveinis
05:19 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap" Laurynas Biveinis
04:54 compile/920501-18.c and -fssa Richard Kenner
03:54 bug in `make TAGS' Denis Chertykov
03:30 bug in emit_move_insn_1 ? Denis Chertykov

September 16, 2000
16:31 binutils 2.10.0.26 is released. H . J . Lu
13:44 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Brad Lucier
13:07 External or local SYMBOL_REF? lars brinkhoff
12:53 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Marek Michalkiewicz
09:22 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap" Andris Pavenis
04:29 Problem with new "make bootstrap" Richard Kenner
03:21 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Martin Buchholz
02:19 GCC's <assert.h> and C99 Joseph S. Myers

September 15, 2000
23:22 Re: -pipe by default Phil Edwards
20:57 Question about -fcheck-memory-usage and Checker Craig Rodrigues
17:32 Re: installing gcc on a pc running Redhat Linux6.2 Eric Christopher
17:25 installing gcc on a pc running Redhat Linux6.2 Michael Fothergill
17:15 compiling gcc on Tru64 5.0a on Alpha dg
17:04 can you help me help? brent verner
16:53 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Byron Stanoszek
16:49 Re: -pipe by default Michael Meissner
16:14 -pipe by default Phil Edwards
14:31 TYPE_USER_ALIGN Richard Kenner
13:01 Re: 2.7.0 Alexandre Oliva
12:52 2.7.0 Quesada Jimenez
12:31 Re: Removing gcc/BUGS Gerald Pfeifer
11:25 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:12 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:58 link errors using the latest snapshot markh
10:01 ALBAAT Inkjet News v.13 - EA-1 / F-G Irma Garcia
07:42 mips-sgi-irix5.2 Jean-Marc Nuzillard
03:25 Question about a varasm change Bernd Schmidt
02:14 Broken vtable-thunks Magnus Fromreide

September 14, 2000
17:03 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization John Wehle
16:54 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization Joern Rennecke
16:41 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization John Wehle
16:22 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization Joern Rennecke
16:09 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization Jeffrey A Law
16:08 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Jeffrey A Law
16:04 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization John Wehle
16:02 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization Jeffrey A Law
16:02 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Neil Booth
15:56 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization Joern Rennecke
15:53 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Neil Booth
15:44 local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization John Wehle
15:09 Re: function_invariant_p versus rtx_varies_p Joern Rennecke
13:52 function_invariant_p versus rtx_varies_p John Wehle
12:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Joern Rennecke
11:43 Re: GCC RPM file tprinceusa
10:56 Re: Removing gcc/BUGS Jeffrey A Law
10:52 GCC RPM file Mark Thurston
10:47 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Joseph S. Myers
09:42 Removing gcc/BUGS Gerald Pfeifer
09:37 Stuck lock Richard Kenner
08:42 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Michael Meissner
08:39 Re: Release criteria suggestions Jeffrey A Law
08:31 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:47 Re: PDP10 support Nick Ing-Simmons
07:43 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
01:17 $B$*CN$i$;(B $BHk=q%;%s%?!<(B
00:55 Re: Reload work in progress Bernd Schmidt
00:21 Re: Reload work in progress Bernd Schmidt
00:15 Re: PDP10 support lars brinkhoff

September 13, 2000
23:52 Re: mips - claritification reedkotler
22:54 Re: Reload work in progress Geoff Keating
22:41 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switchstatement(s)) Mark Mitchell
21:24 data alignment Peeter Joot/Toronto/IBM
20:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Michael Meissner
20:23 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. David O'Brien
20:13 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. David O'Brien
19:53 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s)) Michael Meissner
19:49 Re: Undoing a bootstrap Alexandre Oliva
19:22 Re: Reload work in progress Jeffrey A Law
18:43 Re: mips - claritification reedkotler
18:20 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switchstatement(s)) Mark Mitchell
17:38 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Mike Stump
17:28 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s)) Mike Stump
16:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Joern Rennecke
16:26 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s)) Jeffrey A Law
15:54 ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s)) Gerald Pfeifer
14:51 Re: PDP10 support Gerald Pfeifer
14:46 Re: mips - claritification Gavin Romig-Koch
14:37 Re: bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ? Gerald Pfeifer
14:35 Undoing a bootstrap Richard Kenner
14:33 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:14 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Brad Lucier
14:09 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Toon Moene
14:03 Re: Release criteria suggestions Gerald Pfeifer
14:02 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc Jakub Jelinek
13:51 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Michael Meissner
13:40 Re: mips - claritification Reed Kotler
13:27 f77 correctness on Sparc Brad Lucier
13:27 Re: gcc on hp 10.20 John Wehle
13:00 gcc on hp 10.20 Silvio Bandeira
12:40 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2 Toon Moene
12:23 Re: Use-def chains John Wehle
12:12 Re: data alignment Silvio Bandeira
12:03 Use-def chains Marcio de Oliveira Buss
11:52 Lexing and multibyte character sets Neil Booth
11:40 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Stan Shebs
11:38 Re: bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ? Philipp Thomas
11:00 bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ? Denis Chertykov
10:25 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Richard Kenner
09:57 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Bruce Korb
09:33 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Bernd Schmidt
09:26 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Jeffrey A Law
08:50 Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:49 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov
08:40 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Joe Buck
08:20 Re: GCC Benedetto Proietti
07:43 Re: GCC Erik Mouw
07:31 GCC Ansie de Hoop
07:21 mips - claritification Gavin Romig-Koch
05:17 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Nick Ing-Simmons
03:17 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Joseph S. Myers
01:20 mips - claritification reedkotler
00:24 mips optimization reedkotler

September 12, 2000
23:21 Re: wide character support? Andreas Jaeger
22:48 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2 Maciej Z. Pindera
22:44 "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?) Gerald Pfeifer
20:11 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Mark Mitchell
19:44 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Stan Shebs
19:12 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Stan Shebs
19:05 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Stan Shebs
19:01 wide character support? Brent Phillips
18:43 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov
18:19 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Geoff Keating
18:18 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov
18:12 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Richard Henderson
18:08 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov
17:57 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov
17:55 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Richard Henderson
17:52 Re: data alignment Michael Meissner
14:22 RE: Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem... Tom Zagotta
14:03 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. Marc Espie
13:59 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Stan Shebs
13:46 Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem... Don Mies
13:33 data alignment Silvio Bandeira
11:53 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. Richard Henderson
11:49 Re: Leaving the project indefinitely Toon Moene
11:48 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Toon Moene
11:22 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Bernd Schmidt
11:16 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Joe Buck
11:11 PDP10 support (was Re: m68k MacOS target support?) Joe Buck
10:06 Leaving the project indefinitely Zack Weinberg
09:52 Re: m68k MacOS target support? David Huggins-Daines
08:43 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Michael Meissner
08:11 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Richard Kenner
07:45 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300 Bernd Schmidt
07:43 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300 Jeffrey A Law
07:32 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Jeffrey A Law
07:23 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Mark Mitchell
07:19 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300 Mark Mitchell
07:06 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. Geoff Keating
05:02 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. Gerald Pfeifer
04:10 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc lars brinkhoff
04:09 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Richard Kenner
03:26 Re: m68k MacOS target support? lars brinkhoff
00:45 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300 Bernd Schmidt
00:15 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Mark Mitchell
00:03 Re: m68k MacOS target support? lars brinkhoff
00:02 Re: m68k MacOS target support? lars brinkhoff

September 11, 2000
21:44 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Zack Weinberg
21:33 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Mark Mitchell
20:56 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Michael Meissner
20:47 Re: m68k MacOS target support? Stan Shebs
16:54 gcc-ss-20000911 is now available law
15:12 Re: sdbout.c patch to use assemble_name (Was: Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff) Jeffrey A Law
13:32 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator Geoff Keating
13:17 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator John Wehle
11:52 sdbout.c patch to use assemble_name (Was: Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff) Joern Rennecke
11:25 Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff Zack Weinberg
11:07 varasm patch breaks sh-coff Joern Rennecke
09:07 Template with friend methods problem Christian Savard
07:59 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator Geoff Keating
03:28 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator Manfred Hollstein
00:51 Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator John Wehle

September 10, 2000
14:41 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Geoff Keating
14:31 bizarre ARM PIC code generation Philip Blundell
11:53 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2 Toon Moene
09:44 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Marek Michalkiewicz
06:17 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Geoff Keating
04:22 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Marek Michalkiewicz
01:42 fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2 Maciej Z. Pindera
00:25 Re: need a tester with an old slow box Zack Weinberg

September 09, 2000
23:25 need a tester with an old slow box Zack Weinberg
13:26 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization Geoff Keating
12:41 Signed divide by 2 pessimization Marek Michalkiewicz
12:33 m68k MacOS target support? Michael Sokolov

September 08, 2000
08:43 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus? DJ Delorie
04:42 GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint Jamie Lokier
03:11 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus? Andreas Schwab
03:10 Help for install Gcc 2.95 on Sun SOLARIS version 2.5.1 Andre BA
02:28 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus? Alexandre Oliva
02:13 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus? Andreas Schwab

September 07, 2000
22:13 純商業辦公室出租！ pqa1098z
16:53 Re: MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps Greg McGary
15:13 Re: MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps Jeffrey A Law
14:32 research on open-source software development Yutaka Yamauchi
14:13 unused_prefix_warning - bogus? DJ Delorie
12:04 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Byron Stanoszek
10:20 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Andrea Arcangeli
10:14 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Jamie Lokier
10:11 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Jamie Lokier
10:05 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Andrea Arcangeli
09:57 Re: Data alignment David Edelsohn
09:56 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Jamie Lokier
09:48 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Linus Torvalds
09:39 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Jamie Lokier
09:38 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Linus Torvalds
09:29 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Andrea Arcangeli
08:59 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7] Jamie Lokier
08:40 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch Richard Henderson
05:47 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Matthias Kurz
04:56 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Matthias Kurz
03:34 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch Bernd Schmidt
00:46 Data alignment Silvio Bandeira

September 06, 2000
23:19 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc lars brinkhoff
21:03 Re: configure error Alexandre Oliva
21:01 Re: configure error Mike Stump
20:53 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Mike Stump
20:42 Re: (retracting my comment) Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Alexandre Oliva
20:28 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Tim Prince
20:20 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Alexandre Oliva
20:13 Re: configure error Alexandre Oliva
20:07 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Alexandre Oliva
20:00 (retracting my comment) Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! sidster
19:19 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Zack Weinberg
19:18 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token Zack Weinberg
18:27 Re: dbxout FORCE_TEXT and function sections Jeffrey A Law
17:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Jeffrey A Law
17:49 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Mike Stump
17:48 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Philipp Thomas
17:09 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Mo McKinlay
15:56 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Michael Meissner
15:27 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Marc Espie
14:48 Re: configure error Joe Buck
14:26 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. H . J . Lu
14:22 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Michael Vance
14:18 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Alexandre Oliva
14:10 Re: configure error Alexandre Oliva
14:07 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. H . J . Lu
13:58 configure error Kevin Handy
13:18 MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps Greg McGary
13:05 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree David Edelsohn
12:46 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
12:26 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Jamie Lokier
12:11 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Alexandre Oliva
12:06 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Zack Weinberg
12:05 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Michael Vance
12:02 dbxout FORCE_TEXT and function sections David Edelsohn
11:47 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Laurynas Biveinis
11:46 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors Philipp Thomas
11:44 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. H . J . Lu
11:31 Escape sequence/parse errors Michael Vance
11:29 Re: zlib multilib on host? Alexandre Oliva
11:15 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritan ce all at once! sidster
11:08 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Alexandre Oliva
11:08 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Manfred Hollstein
10:58 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. H . J . Lu
10:57 zlib multilib on host? David Edelsohn
10:29 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. Mike Stump
10:22 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch Richard Henderson
10:18 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Manfred Hollstein
10:13 RE: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Jan Reimers
10:06 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Jeffrey A Law
09:37 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! sidster
08:51 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken. H . J . Lu
08:39 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Joe Buck
08:15 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Manfred Hollstein
08:05 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Alexandre Oliva
07:47 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Jeffrey A Law
07:45 Puzzled by a recent patch Bernd Schmidt
07:26 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Matthias Kurz
07:24 gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS Manfred Hollstein
06:16 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Matthias Kurz
04:13 comp.gnu.embedded (was: embedded An article about the Cygnus tree) Bjorn Eriksson
03:33 Re: File sorting routine Alexandre Oliva
03:27 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Alexandre Oliva
03:17 File sorting routine Rob Christopher
03:17 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Erik Mouw
02:18 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc lars brinkhoff
02:15 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc lars brinkhoff
01:43 Re: Problems with the way we calculate costs Bernd Schmidt

September 05, 2000
23:38 cpplib: redoing the lexer Neil Booth
23:36 Re: best optimization under IRIX ? Tim Prince
22:59 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Benjamin Scherrey
20:26 best optimization under IRIX ? Matthias Kurz
18:32 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Joe Buck
16:54 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Andrew Morton
16:44 Re: recent change to gcc Richard Henderson
16:35 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! llewelly
16:14 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Russ.Shaw
16:05 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Michael Meissner
15:53 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Nix
15:37 Re: recent change to gcc Tom Tromey
15:25 Re: recent change to gcc Bruce Korb
15:18 -fstack-check Charles G Waldman
15:09 Re: PAGESIZE Zack Weinberg
14:58 Re: PAGESIZE Bruce Korb
13:59 Dwarf 1 pending types Colin Burgess
13:41 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Zack Weinberg
13:00 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all atonce! Benjamin Scherrey
12:12 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all atonce! rlau
12:02 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Joe Buck
11:49 GNU Objective C Micah Walsh
11:30 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Graham Stott
11:20 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Graham Stott
11:15 Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once! Benjamin Scherrey
10:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
10:44 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
10:08 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Bruce Korb
09:26 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Zack Weinberg
09:11 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris Bruce Korb
06:49 gcc on macosxserver Peter Holzer
04:19 Re: Does anyone know good references for TREE? Gabriel Dos Reis
00:19 Does anyone know good references for TREE? Kosinus

September 04, 2000
21:41 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Russ.Shaw
21:31 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Jean-Pierre Radley
21:24 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Joe Buck
21:19 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
21:06 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Alexandre Oliva
19:19 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree David Edelsohn
18:15 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
18:13 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Jan Dvorak
18:03 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree David Edelsohn
17:32 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
17:01 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem H . J . Lu
16:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree Geoff Keating
16:52 gcc-ss-20000904 is now available law
15:07 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Mark Kettenis
14:22 An article about the Cygnus tree Michael Sokolov
13:52 repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file. David O'Brien
08:55 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem H . J . Lu
04:21 Re: I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29. Andreas Jaeger
03:47 Re: I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29. Joern Rennecke
00:30 "register struct": work in progress Benedetto Proietti

September 03, 2000
20:29 RE: Advance warning: g77-2.96 and LAPACK 3.0. Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
15:38 The Toad Trial Bruce Korb
14:19 RE: Patch: configure changes for zlib Anthony Green
13:49 Re: Adding zlib to GCC Tom Tromey
12:59 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Zack Weinberg
12:10 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Marc Espie
11:11 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem H . J . Lu
09:42 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Philip Blundell
08:33 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem Marc Espie
00:51 smithy tools akl
00:19 GCC 2.95.2 Successful Make Shell M. Shrader
00:11 GCC 2.95.2 Successful Make Shell M. Shrader

September 02, 2000
23:02 Building CVS version on HP-UX 10.20 Albert Chin-A-Young
16:19 Here's the CVS toad... Bruce Korb
15:12 Re: MIPS cross glibc? Ulf Carlsson
13:48 Advance warning: g77-2.96 and LAPACK 3.0. Toon Moene

September 01, 2000
19:23 I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29. H . J . Lu
19:01 Homeschooler schooled@unbounded.com
17:38 Re: libiberty (was: Re: Mangle question) Hans-Peter Nilsson
17:05 RE: 64 bit time_t, when? Donn Terry
16:10 [c++] builtin functions and namespaces brent verner
12:27 Re: Adding zlib to GCC Joe Buck
12:19 Re: deriving a class from iostream/streambuf Joe Buck
10:52 g77/gcc offer of assistance Adam Johansen
09:33 libiberty (was: Re: Mangle question) Carlo Wood
04:26 You can ask me where i can find good g++ manual for linux(redhat) Leonid Molochniy
02:40 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc Torbjorn Granlund
02:16 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc lars brinkhoff
01:48 pb with gcc on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0d Buis, Cyril
00:02 Re: Implementation of libc functions in std:: brent verner

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.6