gcc archive
author index for September, 2000

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

$BHk=q%;%s%?!<(B

• 2000-09-14 01:17 $B$*CN$i$;(B

a.walter

• 2000-09-18 23:15 GCC + Unixware 7.0.1

Abani, Priya

• 2000-09-25 13:29 C++ front end

Adam Johansen

• 2000-09-01 10:52 g77/gcc offer of assistance

Adarsh MP

• 2000-09-21 20:26 enquiry

Akim Demaille

• 2000-09-25 02:04 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

akl

• 2000-09-03 00:51 smithy tools

Albert Chin-A-Young

• 2000-09-02 23:02 Building CVS version on HP-UX 10.20
• 2000-09-17 22:19 ANSI C compiler required to build GCC from CVS?

Alejandro Arredondo

• 2000-09-21 14:57 Question: dynamic libraries?

Alex Kononov

• 2000-09-26 02:58 pow(),cos() ....

Alexandre Oliva

• 2000-09-04 21:06 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 03:27 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-06 03:33 Re: File sorting routine
• 2000-09-06 08:05 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 11:08 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 11:29 Re: zlib multilib on host?
• 2000-09-06 12:11 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 14:10 Re: configure error
• 2000-09-06 14:18 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 20:07 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 20:13 Re: configure error
• 2000-09-06 20:20 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 20:42 Re: (retracting my comment) Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-06 21:03 Re: configure error
• 2000-09-08 02:28 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus?
• 2000-09-13 19:49 Re: Undoing a bootstrap
• 2000-09-15 13:01 Re: 2.7.0
• 2000-09-17 16:45 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-18 01:33 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96...
• 2000-09-18 01:35 Re: ANSI C compiler required to build GCC from CVS?
• 2000-09-18 02:06 Re: 64-bit GCC for Sparc Solaris...
• 2000-09-18 09:13 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-18 09:52 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-22 11:59 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap
• 2000-09-25 06:53 Re: Pathalogical divides

Allen Barnett

• 2000-09-26 10:15 FORTRAN pointer

amal Burman

• 2000-09-25 09:41 New template class of Matrix and Etc

Andi Kleen

• 2000-09-23 06:02 fixincl on linux systems
• 2000-09-25 10:43 Re: fixincl on linux systems
• 2000-09-25 11:13 Re: fixincl on linux systems

Andre BA

• 2000-09-08 03:10 Help for install Gcc 2.95 on Sun SOLARIS version 2.5.1

Andrea Arcangeli

• 2000-09-07 09:29 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 10:05 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 10:20 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-18 15:35 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-18 15:59 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-18 18:07 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 07:21 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 07:27 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 08:14 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 11:17 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 11:19 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 13:34 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

Andreas Jaeger

• 2000-09-04 04:21 Re: I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29.
• 2000-09-12 23:21 Re: wide character support?

Andreas Schultz

• 2000-09-22 07:38 g++ on Dec Alpha

Andreas Schwab

• 2000-09-08 02:13 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus?
• 2000-09-08 03:11 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus?
• 2000-09-22 01:45 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-26 01:29 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

Andrew Morton

• 2000-09-05 16:54 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc

Andris Pavenis

• 2000-09-16 09:22 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap"

Angela Kreikemeier

• 2000-09-28 02:32 GCC und GNUEmacs

Ansie de Hoop

• 2000-09-13 07:31 GCC

Anthony Green

• 2000-09-03 14:19 RE: Patch: configure changes for zlib

Arne Sorli

• 2000-09-25 15:34 long long and __extension__ on hpux

Atif Shahab

• 2000-09-25 01:09 multiple defintions error
• 2000-09-25 04:03 Re: multiple defintions error
• 2000-09-28 01:55 Re: multiple defintions error
• 2000-09-28 20:00 Re: multiple defintions error

Benedetto Proietti

• 2000-09-04 00:30 "register struct": work in progress
• 2000-09-13 08:20 Re: GCC

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2000-09-19 23:11 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 10:18 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 12:52 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-25 12:04 Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck.
• 2000-09-26 09:01 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)

Benjamin Scherrey

• 2000-09-05 11:15 Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-05 13:00 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all atonce!
• 2000-09-05 22:59 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-17 23:29 Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96...
• 2000-09-18 23:29 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96...
• 2000-09-19 11:44 Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 05:29 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 09:14 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 12:29 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 13:16 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-21 11:59 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-25 10:42 Linking problems in latest cvs deck.
• 2000-09-25 11:25 Re: Linking problems in latest cvs deck.

Bernd Schmidt

• 2000-09-06 01:43 Re: Problems with the way we calculate costs
• 2000-09-06 07:45 Puzzled by a recent patch
• 2000-09-07 03:34 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch
• 2000-09-12 00:45 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300
• 2000-09-12 07:45 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300
• 2000-09-12 11:22 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 09:33 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-14 00:21 Re: Reload work in progress
• 2000-09-14 00:55 Re: Reload work in progress
• 2000-09-15 03:25 Question about a varasm change
• 2000-09-18 02:32 Re: Question about a varasm change
• 2000-09-19 08:34 Re: Question about a varasm change

Billinghurst, David (CRTS)

• 2000-09-03 20:29 RE: Advance warning: g77-2.96 and LAPACK 3.0.

Bjorn Eriksson

• 2000-09-06 04:13 comp.gnu.embedded (was: embedded An article about the Cygnus tree)

Bob Kuhn

• 2000-09-25 10:01 FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS

Brad Lucier

• 2000-09-13 13:27 f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-13 14:14 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-16 13:44 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-18 09:18 Re: compile/920501-18.c and -fssa
• 2000-09-18 11:59 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-21 20:54 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3

brent

• 2000-09-29 13:01 hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 14:03 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 14:40 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 19:01 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 19:14 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 23:45 Re: [c++] builtin functions and namespaces

Brent Phillips

• 2000-09-12 19:01 wide character support?

brent verner

• 2000-09-01 00:02 Re: Implementation of libc functions in std::
• 2000-09-01 16:10 [c++] builtin functions and namespaces
• 2000-09-15 17:04 can you help me help?
• 2000-09-26 03:06 Re: pow(),cos() ....

Bruce Korb

• 2000-09-02 16:19 Here's the CVS toad...
• 2000-09-03 15:38 The Toad Trial
• 2000-09-05 09:11 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-05 10:08 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-05 14:58 Re: PAGESIZE
• 2000-09-05 15:25 Re: recent change to gcc
• 2000-09-13 09:57 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-25 10:20 Re: fixincl on linux systems
• 2000-09-25 11:01 Re: fixincl on linux systems

Bruno Haible

• 2000-09-29 09:48 gperf 2.7.2 is released

Buis, Cyril

• 2000-09-01 01:48 pb with gcc on alphaev56-dec-osf4.0d

Byron Stanoszek

• 2000-09-07 12:04 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-15 16:53 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-28 19:13 warning: value computed is not used

Carlo Wood

• 2000-09-01 09:33 libiberty (was: Re: Mangle question)

ceritandogan

• 2000-09-27 03:08 gcc problem

Charles G Waldman

• 2000-09-05 15:18 -fstack-check

Chris G. Demetriou

• 2000-09-21 17:59 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3

Christian Iseli

• 2000-09-27 07:14 Lots of new errors in make check on alpha

Christian Savard

• 2000-09-11 09:07 Template with friend methods problem

Colin Burgess

• 2000-09-05 13:59 Dwarf 1 pending types

Craig Rodrigues

• 2000-09-15 20:57 Question about -fcheck-memory-usage and Checker
• 2000-09-17 15:53 warning: multi-line comment (why?)

Daniel Berlin

• 2000-09-19 07:32 Re: Java and zlib

David Edelsohn

• 2000-09-04 18:03 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-04 19:19 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 10:57 zlib multilib on host?
• 2000-09-06 12:02 dbxout FORCE_TEXT and function sections
• 2000-09-06 13:05 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-07 09:57 Re: Data alignment
• 2000-09-22 09:50 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-26 12:17 stale CVS lock?
• 2000-09-29 12:55 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z.

David Howells

• 2000-09-19 08:01 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

David Huggins-Daines

• 2000-09-12 09:52 Re: m68k MacOS target support?

David O'Brien

• 2000-09-04 13:52 repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-13 20:13 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-13 20:23 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.

David Ronis

• 2000-09-25 22:05 RE: gcc-ss-20000925 is now available

Denis Chertykov

• 2000-09-13 11:00 bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ?
• 2000-09-17 03:30 bug in emit_move_insn_1 ?
• 2000-09-17 03:54 bug in `make TAGS'
• 2000-09-22 06:17 Re: bug in emit_move_insn_1 ?

Dennis Ferguson

• 2000-09-19 18:42 Inline function structure vs. address passing

dg

• 2000-09-15 17:15 compiling gcc on Tru64 5.0a on Alpha

DJ Delorie

• 2000-09-07 14:13 unused_prefix_warning - bogus?
• 2000-09-08 08:43 Re: unused_prefix_warning - bogus?

Don Mies

• 2000-09-12 13:46 Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...
• 2000-09-18 11:06 Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...Repost...
• 2000-09-18 14:39 Re: Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...Repost..

Donn Terry

• 2000-09-01 17:05 RE: 64 bit time_t, when?
• 2000-09-28 16:21 Slight oddness with new preproc

Drcadmando

• 2000-09-20 13:59 Trailing underscores needed

Eric Christopher

• 2000-09-15 17:32 Re: installing gcc on a pc running Redhat Linux6.2

Eric Lemings

• 2000-09-18 11:02 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html

Erik Mouw

• 2000-09-06 03:17 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-13 07:43 Re: GCC
• 2000-09-17 07:17 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-22 02:02 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-22 02:15 Re: enquiry

flynn

• 2000-09-22 08:13 Symbol collisions with g77

Franz Sirl

• 2000-09-19 07:45 Re: Java and zlib

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2000-09-05 04:19 Re: Does anyone know good references for TREE?
• 2000-09-22 04:51 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-22 10:22 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

Gavin Romig-Koch

• 2000-09-13 07:21 mips - claritification
• 2000-09-13 14:46 Re: mips - claritification

Gene Montgomery

• 2000-09-18 08:23 Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

Geoff Keating

• 2000-09-04 16:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-09 13:26 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-10 06:17 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-10 14:41 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-11 07:59 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator
• 2000-09-11 13:32 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator
• 2000-09-12 07:06 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-12 18:19 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 22:54 Re: Reload work in progress
• 2000-09-17 22:09 Re: Question about very old patch
• 2000-09-18 13:25 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-18 13:50 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling
• 2000-09-18 14:44 Re: 128-bit integers and intmax_t
• 2000-09-24 22:53 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-24 22:57 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-24 23:04 Re: long long long
• 2000-09-24 23:29 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-25 14:27 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-29 13:37 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z.
• 2000-09-29 14:29 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-30 16:06 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-30 17:10 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z.

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2000-09-12 05:02 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-12 22:44 "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-13 14:03 Re: Release criteria suggestions
• 2000-09-13 14:37 Re: bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ?
• 2000-09-13 14:51 Re: PDP10 support
• 2000-09-13 15:54 ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s))
• 2000-09-14 09:42 Removing gcc/BUGS
• 2000-09-15 12:31 Re: Removing gcc/BUGS
• 2000-09-17 10:39 Re: Question about very old patch
• 2000-09-19 07:11 Java and zlib
• 2000-09-19 07:41 Re: Java and zlib
• 2000-09-20 06:12 Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2000-09-22 01:44 Re: bug report ?
• 2000-09-23 02:31 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Graham Stott

• 2000-09-05 11:20 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-05 11:30 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris

Greg McGary

• 2000-09-06 13:18 MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps
• 2000-09-07 16:53 Re: MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps
• 2000-09-20 18:22 RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes
• 2000-09-21 00:35 Re: RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes
• 2000-09-22 00:46 thread_jumps does nothing for ix86
• 2000-09-22 01:24 Re: thread_jumps does nothing for ix86

H . J . Lu

• 2000-09-01 19:23 I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29.
• 2000-09-03 11:11 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-04 08:55 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-04 17:01 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-06 08:51 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 10:58 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 11:44 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 14:07 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 14:26 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-16 16:31 binutils 2.10.0.26 is released.
• 2000-09-17 10:08 Re: Question about very old patch
• 2000-09-17 11:13 Re: Question about very old patch
• 2000-09-17 22:48 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-20 08:54 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2000-09-21 15:21 Re: Question: dynamic libraries?
• 2000-09-23 08:53 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8

Hans-Peter Nilsson

• 2000-09-01 17:38 Re: libiberty (was: Re: Mangle question)

info

• 2000-09-25 12:36 $B%"%$!&%F%#!<!&%j%s%/2q0wJg=8$N$*CN$i$;(B

Irma Garcia

• 2000-09-15 10:01 ALBAAT Inkjet News v.13 - EA-1 / F-G

Jakub Jelinek

• 2000-09-13 14:02 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-27 04:48 Re: assembly optimizations...

Jamie Lokier

• 2000-09-06 12:26 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-07 08:59 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 09:39 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 09:56 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 10:11 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 10:14 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [was Re: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-08 04:42 GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-18 03:04 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-19 01:41 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 09:28 zlib broken in CVS
• 2000-09-19 10:13 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-19 10:23 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-20 08:52 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-24 13:57 Re: macros with traditional cpp
• 2000-09-25 09:43 Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-25 12:52 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-25 12:59 CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes
• 2000-09-25 13:26 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes
• 2000-09-26 03:43 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-26 03:57 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 04:15 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes
• 2000-09-26 04:36 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-26 04:37 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-26 10:15 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 10:24 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 16:41 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-27 04:36 Re: assembly optimizations...
• 2000-09-27 09:03 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken

Jan Dvorak

• 2000-09-04 18:13 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-17 16:12 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-19 09:05 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-19 09:09 Re: Help with gcc to assembler compilation
• 2000-09-19 11:44 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-20 12:01 Re: Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler
• 2000-09-20 17:02 Re: First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ?
• 2000-09-25 02:59 Re: multiple defintions error
• 2000-09-25 08:03 Re: multiple defintions error

Jan Hubicka

• 2000-09-29 12:15 Re: GCC build failed with your patch on 2000-09-29T11:50:00Z.

Jan Reimers

• 2000-09-06 10:13 RE: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!

Jason Merrill

• 2000-09-18 00:24 Re: Question about a varasm change
• 2000-09-21 14:28 Re: Question about a varasm change
• 2000-09-22 10:56 Re: Question about a varasm change

Jean-Marc Nuzillard

• 2000-09-15 07:42 mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-21 01:56 mips-sgi-irix5.2

Jean-Pierre Radley

• 2000-09-04 21:31 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree

Jeffrey A Law

• 2000-09-06 07:47 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 10:06 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 17:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 18:27 Re: dbxout FORCE_TEXT and function sections
• 2000-09-07 15:13 Re: MIPS div_trap vs. general conditional traps
• 2000-09-11 15:12 Re: sdbout.c patch to use assemble_name (Was: Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff)
• 2000-09-12 07:32 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 07:43 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300
• 2000-09-13 09:26 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-13 16:26 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s))
• 2000-09-13 19:22 Re: Reload work in progress
• 2000-09-14 08:39 Re: Release criteria suggestions
• 2000-09-14 10:56 Re: Removing gcc/BUGS
• 2000-09-14 16:02 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 16:08 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-14 16:09 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-18 08:34 Re: Question about a varasm change
• 2000-09-23 13:38 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap
• 2000-09-23 13:38 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-25 08:25 Re: that PATCH for gcc 2.95 branch

jfm2

• 2000-09-18 23:02 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

Jim Wilson

• 2000-09-26 12:28 Re: stale CVS lock?

Joe Buck

• 2000-09-01 12:19 Re: deriving a class from iostream/streambuf
• 2000-09-01 12:27 Re: Adding zlib to GCC
• 2000-09-04 21:24 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-05 12:02 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-05 18:32 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-06 08:39 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-06 14:48 Re: configure error
• 2000-09-12 11:11 PDP10 support (was Re: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-12 11:16 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 08:40 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-20 08:32 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-21 14:37 Re: porting

Joel Sherrill

• 2000-09-21 14:46 bug in a29k-coff

Joern Rennecke

• 2000-09-04 03:47 Re: I believe shared library/PIC is broken under ia32 since Aug. 29.
• 2000-09-11 11:07 varasm patch breaks sh-coff
• 2000-09-11 11:52 sdbout.c patch to use assemble_name (Was: Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff)
• 2000-09-13 16:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-14 12:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-14 15:09 Re: function_invariant_p versus rtx_varies_p
• 2000-09-14 15:56 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 16:22 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 16:54 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-18 06:05 Re: External or local SYMBOL_REF?
• 2000-09-25 14:28 Re: load_multiple for argument push!?
• 2000-09-25 14:34 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-25 15:12 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-25 15:18 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-25 16:33 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)
• 2000-09-25 16:39 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-26 08:29 Re: multiple defintions error

John Wehle

• 2000-09-11 00:51 Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator
• 2000-09-11 13:17 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator
• 2000-09-13 12:23 Re: Use-def chains
• 2000-09-13 13:27 Re: gcc on hp 10.20
• 2000-09-14 13:52 function_invariant_p versus rtx_varies_p
• 2000-09-14 15:44 local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 16:04 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 16:41 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-14 17:03 Re: local-alloc update_equiv_regs and moving register initialization
• 2000-09-18 16:53 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-18 18:38 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 13:16 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

Joseph S. Myers

• 2000-09-13 03:17 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-14 10:47 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-16 02:19 GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-18 14:14 128-bit integers and intmax_t
• 2000-09-18 14:25 -Wtraditional, integer constants and C99
• 2000-09-22 13:33 Re: GNU long long
• 2000-09-23 10:25 Re: BUG: %lc in printf fails
• 2000-09-23 12:33 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)
• 2000-09-23 17:00 The old READMEs
• 2000-09-27 07:40 PRs vanishing from database

Kamil Iskra

• 2000-09-21 13:03 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2000-09-13 08:50 Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-13 14:33 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-14 07:43 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-14 08:31 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-15 11:12 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-15 11:25 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur

Kazu Hirata

• 2000-09-21 02:59 load_multiple for argument push!?
• 2000-09-25 23:47 RE: load_multiple for argument push!?

Kevin Handy

• 2000-09-06 13:58 configure error

Kosinus

• 2000-09-05 00:19 Does anyone know good references for TREE?

Koundinya.K

• 2000-09-21 08:42 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2

Krakowczyk, Andreas

• 2000-09-22 09:33 gcc-2.95.2 on system mips-sni-sysv4

lars brinkhoff

• 2000-09-01 02:16 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-06 02:15 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-06 02:18 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-06 23:19 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-12 00:02 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 00:03 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 03:26 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 04:10 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-14 00:15 Re: PDP10 support
• 2000-09-16 13:07 External or local SYMBOL_REF?
• 2000-09-19 10:10 Re: External or local SYMBOL_REF?

Laurent Guerby

• 2000-09-22 10:52 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-26 12:56 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

Laurynas Biveinis

• 2000-09-06 11:47 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-17 05:19 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap"
• 2000-09-17 05:20 Re: Problem with new "make bootstrap"

law

• 2000-09-04 16:52 gcc-ss-20000904 is now available
• 2000-09-11 16:54 gcc-ss-20000911 is now available
• 2000-09-18 16:55 gcc-ss-20000918 is now available
• 2000-09-25 16:52 gcc-ss-20000925 is now available

Leonid Molochniy

• 2000-09-01 04:26 You can ask me where i can find good g++ manual for linux(redhat)

Linus Torvalds

• 2000-09-07 09:38 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-07 09:48 Re: spin_lock forgets to clobber memory and other smp fixes [wasRe: [patch] waitqueue optimization, 2.4.0-test7]
• 2000-09-18 15:40 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint

llewelly

• 2000-09-05 16:35 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-18 01:04 Re: Code that worked in gcc-2.95.2 but not in 2.96...
• 2000-09-21 14:22 Re: RFC: adding lookups on the target names for alias attributes
• 2000-09-22 20:57 Re: initialization of non-const reference
• 2000-09-22 21:00 Re: g++ on Dec Alpha

Maciej Z. Pindera

• 2000-09-10 01:42 fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2
• 2000-09-12 22:48 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2

Magnus Fromreide

• 2000-09-15 02:14 Broken vtable-thunks
• 2000-09-21 23:32 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3

Manfred Hollstein

• 2000-09-06 07:24 gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 08:15 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 10:18 Re: gcc-2_95-branch broken in CVS
• 2000-09-06 11:08 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-11 03:28 Re: Recent regression & configuring ppc simulator

Marc Espie

• 2000-09-03 08:33 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-03 12:10 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-06 15:27 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-12 14:03 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-17 06:22 Question about very old patch
• 2000-09-19 10:32 Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config
• 2000-09-20 03:52 Bogus alpha config files ?
• 2000-09-21 17:40 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-21 17:44 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-24 17:40 that PATCH for gcc 2.95 branch
• 2000-09-26 15:40 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config

Marcio de Oliveira Buss

• 2000-09-13 12:03 Use-def chains
• 2000-09-27 21:52 LOG_LINKS in the gcc
• 2000-09-29 19:10 gcc and VCG

Marco Franzen

• 2000-09-18 07:01 (C and C++:) conditional (?:) type balancing wrt comma op and 0 denoting null

Marek Michalkiewicz

• 2000-09-09 12:41 Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-10 04:22 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-10 09:44 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization
• 2000-09-16 12:53 Re: Signed divide by 2 pessimization

Mark Kettenis

• 2000-09-04 15:07 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem

Mark Mitchell

• 2000-09-11 21:33 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 00:15 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 07:19 Re: movstrictqi/movstricthi fix for h8300
• 2000-09-12 07:23 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 20:11 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 18:20 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switchstatement(s))
• 2000-09-13 22:41 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switchstatement(s))
• 2000-09-17 10:30 Re: compile/920501-18.c and -fssa
• 2000-09-18 22:27 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html
• 2000-09-21 23:55 Re: status?
• 2000-09-22 00:29 Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-22 21:44 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-24 23:43 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-25 07:29 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-25 13:45 Re: C++ front end
• 2000-09-26 20:36 Re: Status of new C++ abi
• 2000-09-30 09:52 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

Mark Thurston

• 2000-09-14 10:52 GCC RPM file

markh

• 2000-09-15 10:58 link errors using the latest snapshot
• 2000-09-20 08:16 link errors using the latest snapshot
• 2000-09-20 08:24 Re: link errors using latest snapshot

Markus Kuhn

• 2000-09-23 09:35 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)
• 2000-09-23 10:02 BUG: %lc in printf fails
• 2000-09-23 13:31 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)

Martin Buchholz

• 2000-09-16 03:21 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-21 17:31 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-22 23:38 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-23 00:07 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99

Martin v. Loewis

• 2000-09-23 12:22 Re: gcc ignores locale (no UTF-8 source code supported)

Matt Minnis

• 2000-09-22 09:41 GNU long long

Matthias Kurz

• 2000-09-05 20:26 best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-06 06:16 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-06 07:26 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-07 04:56 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-07 05:47 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?

Meir Hacohen

• 2000-09-19 23:01 problem installing gcc 2.95.2 on m68k-coff (fwd)

Micah Walsh

• 2000-09-05 11:49 GNU Objective C

Michael Fothergill

• 2000-09-15 17:25 installing gcc on a pc running Redhat Linux6.2

Michael Meissner

• 2000-09-05 16:05 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-06 15:56 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-11 20:56 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 08:43 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-12 17:52 Re: data alignment
• 2000-09-13 13:51 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-13 19:53 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s))
• 2000-09-13 20:37 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-14 08:42 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-15 16:49 Re: -pipe by default

Michael Sokolov

• 2000-09-04 14:22 An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-04 17:32 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-04 18:15 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-04 21:19 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-05 10:44 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-05 10:54 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 12:46 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-09 12:33 m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 17:57 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 18:08 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 18:18 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 18:43 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 08:49 Re: m68k MacOS target support?

Michael Vance

• 2000-09-06 11:31 Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 12:05 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 14:22 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-19 10:16 [MDavies@acclaimstudios.co.uk: RE: [Algorithms] A word to the wise]

Mike Stump

• 2000-09-06 10:29 Re: Parallel build on SMP is even more broken.
• 2000-09-06 17:49 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-06 20:53 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 21:01 Re: configure error
• 2000-09-13 17:28 Re: ChangeLog entries (was: C++ codegen bug for switch statement(s))
• 2000-09-13 17:38 Re: Silently checking whether diagnostics would occur
• 2000-09-18 17:17 Re: Compilation time/date
• 2000-09-20 11:01 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2000-09-20 14:02 Re: Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler
• 2000-09-22 12:56 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-22 17:51 Re: long long long
• 2000-09-25 11:51 Re: Database printing routine
• 2000-09-28 16:58 Re: multiple defintions error
• 2000-09-29 14:07 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 14:27 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-30 15:55 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?

Mo McKinlay

• 2000-09-06 17:09 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors

Nathan Never

• 2000-09-26 08:47 gcc download

nbecker

• 2000-09-21 19:25 status?
• 2000-09-28 12:03 g++ missing warning

Neil Booth

• 2000-09-05 23:38 cpplib: redoing the lexer
• 2000-09-13 11:52 Lexing and multibyte character sets
• 2000-09-14 15:53 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-14 16:02 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-20 09:38 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-24 14:12 [NeilB@earthling.net: Re: macros with traditional cpp]
• 2000-09-25 14:10 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-25 14:29 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes
• 2000-09-25 14:30 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-25 15:53 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-26 10:13 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-26 10:18 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 10:21 Re: CPP outputs wrong number of newlines sometimes
• 2000-09-26 15:21 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 23:18 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-27 11:09 Re: Recent change in the way options are given to cpp
• 2000-09-28 23:12 Re: Slight oddness with new preproc

Nick Ing-Simmons

• 2000-09-13 05:17 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-14 07:47 Re: PDP10 support

Nix

• 2000-09-05 15:53 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree

Olivier Hainque

• 2000-09-27 01:10 Recent change in the way options are given to cpp
• 2000-09-27 23:50 Re: Recent change in the way options are given to cpp

Ovanes Manucharyan

• 2000-09-18 15:26 Compilation time/date

Parham, Beronica J

• 2000-09-28 12:57 Looking to join a resource group

Paul Duffy

• 2000-09-20 16:45 First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ?
• 2000-09-20 17:24 Re: First release containing thread safe exceptions for Solaris ?

Paul Kinzelman

• 2000-09-25 07:08 gcc/gdb contracting?

Paul Schulz

• 2000-09-21 17:08 Re: Question: dynamic libraries?

Peeter Joot/Toronto/IBM

• 2000-09-13 21:24 data alignment

Peter Holzer

• 2000-09-05 06:49 gcc on macosxserver

Peter R. Torpman

• 2000-09-18 00:03 64-bit GCC for Sparc Solaris...

Phil Edwards

• 2000-09-15 16:14 -pipe by default
• 2000-09-15 23:22 Re: -pipe by default
• 2000-09-20 09:48 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-21 11:56 -B${prefix} during bootstrap
• 2000-09-22 12:27 Re: -B${prefix} during bootstrap
• 2000-09-23 17:05 Re: Parallel build problems on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
• 2000-09-25 11:32 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-29 13:34 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?
• 2000-09-29 18:15 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?

Philip Blundell

• 2000-09-03 09:42 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-10 14:31 bizarre ARM PIC code generation
• 2000-09-24 12:48 macros with traditional cpp

Philipp Thomas

• 2000-09-06 11:46 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 17:48 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-13 11:38 Re: bug in gcc/po/POTFILES.in ?

pqa1098z

• 2000-09-07 22:13 純商業辦公室出租！

Quesada Jimenez

• 2000-09-15 12:52 2.7.0

Ray Samborsky

• 2000-09-20 14:23 mailing list

Reed Kotler

• 2000-09-13 13:40 Re: mips - claritification

reedkotler

• 2000-09-13 00:24 mips optimization
• 2000-09-13 01:20 mips - claritification
• 2000-09-13 18:43 Re: mips - claritification
• 2000-09-13 23:52 Re: mips - claritification
• 2000-09-18 13:07 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

Richard Henderson

• 2000-09-05 16:44 Re: recent change to gcc
• 2000-09-06 10:22 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch
• 2000-09-07 08:40 Re: Puzzled by a recent patch
• 2000-09-12 11:53 Re: repository copy of FreeBSD i386 config file.
• 2000-09-12 17:55 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 18:12 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-17 12:53 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 14:24 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 14:43 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 16:26 Re: warning: multi-line comment (why?)
• 2000-09-19 10:23 Re: GCC proposal for "@" asm constraint
• 2000-09-19 10:25 Re: Java and zlib
• 2000-09-24 13:57 Re: macros with traditional cpp
• 2000-09-24 14:18 Re: macros with traditional cpp
• 2000-09-26 13:55 Re: Bogus alpha config files ?
• 2000-09-26 14:11 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config
• 2000-09-26 19:53 Re: Of libgcc -pic and -shared and openbsd config
• 2000-09-30 15:44 Re: egcs-20000925 code generation bug

Richard Kenner

• 2000-09-12 04:09 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc
• 2000-09-12 08:11 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 10:25 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-13 14:35 Undoing a bootstrap
• 2000-09-14 09:37 Stuck lock
• 2000-09-15 14:31 TYPE_USER_ALIGN
• 2000-09-16 04:29 Problem with new "make bootstrap"
• 2000-09-17 04:54 compile/920501-18.c and -fssa
• 2000-09-17 06:56 Problem with execute/20000801-1.c on Alpha
• 2000-09-17 07:11 Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 13:59 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 14:39 Re: Problem with alpha.c:print_operand
• 2000-09-17 17:16 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling
• 2000-09-18 09:32 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-18 09:49 RE: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-18 13:12 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-18 13:52 Re: Change to readonly conflict handling
• 2000-09-21 12:12 Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-21 17:12 Re: bug in a29k-coff
• 2000-09-22 09:32 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-22 18:14 Re: long long long
• 2000-09-25 02:43 Re: Pathalogical divides

Richard Zidlicky

• 2000-09-30 14:04 egcs-20000925 code generation bug

rlau

• 2000-09-05 12:12 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all atonce!

Rob Christopher

• 2000-09-06 03:17 File sorting routine

Rob Emanuele

• 2000-09-29 15:31 Building GCC on Mac OS X

Robert Dewar

• 2000-09-25 02:35 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-25 05:19 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-25 06:57 Re: Pathalogical divides
• 2000-09-25 17:28 Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-29 09:30 Re: g++ missing warning
• 2000-09-30 05:26 Re: hacking gcc - avoiding bootstrap?

Robert Lipe

• 2000-09-19 08:51 Re: GCC + Unixware 7.0.1

Robertson, David

• 2000-09-25 08:46 Database printing routine

Russ.Shaw

• 2000-09-04 21:41 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree
• 2000-09-05 16:14 Re: An article about the Cygnus tree

schooled@unbounded.com

• 2000-09-01 19:01 Homeschooler

Shell M. Shrader

• 2000-09-03 00:11 GCC 2.95.2 Successful Make
• 2000-09-03 00:19 GCC 2.95.2 Successful Make

sidster

• 2000-09-06 09:37 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!
• 2000-09-06 11:15 Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritan ce all at once!
• 2000-09-06 20:00 (retracting my comment) Re: Non-default ctors, virtual base classes, & multiple inheritance all at once!

Silvio Bandeira

• 2000-09-07 00:46 Data alignment
• 2000-09-12 13:33 data alignment
• 2000-09-13 12:12 Re: data alignment
• 2000-09-13 13:00 gcc on hp 10.20

Sjoerd Adema

• 2000-09-22 08:23 initialization of non-const reference

Srini Eravelli

• 2000-09-20 11:35 Internal compiler error with ppc860 based compiler

Stan Shebs

• 2000-09-11 20:47 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 13:59 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 19:05 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 19:12 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 19:44 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-13 11:40 Re: "Dead" Ports (was: m68k MacOS target support?)
• 2000-09-18 15:38 Re: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?
• 2000-09-22 18:21 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

Steven King

• 2000-09-20 09:33 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3

Stu Meikle

• 2000-09-21 03:03 porting

T, Anuradha (Anuradha)

• 2000-09-25 23:55 Problem while installing GCC 2.95.2

Theodore Papadopoulo

• 2000-09-19 15:08 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 01:39 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3
• 2000-09-20 08:42 Re: Latest snapshot won't build with --enable-libstdcxx-v3

Tim Hollebeek

• 2000-09-22 10:22 Re: Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'

Tim Josling

• 2000-09-22 17:00 Coding convention: use of `!x' vs. `! x'
• 2000-09-22 17:14 long long long

Tim Prince

• 2000-09-05 23:36 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-06 20:28 Re: best optimization under IRIX ?
• 2000-09-21 06:18 Re: mips-sgi-irix5.2
• 2000-09-28 07:15 Re: GCC und GNUEmacs

Tod Thomas

• 2000-09-22 11:07 Register?

Tom Tromey

• 2000-09-03 13:49 Re: Adding zlib to GCC
• 2000-09-05 15:37 Re: recent change to gcc

Tom Zagotta

• 2000-09-12 14:22 RE: Casting Overloaded Function Pointer Problem...

Toon Moene

• 2000-09-02 13:48 Advance warning: g77-2.96 and LAPACK 3.0.
• 2000-09-10 11:53 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2
• 2000-09-12 11:48 Re: m68k MacOS target support?
• 2000-09-12 11:49 Re: Leaving the project indefinitely
• 2000-09-13 12:40 Re: fortran and c pointers in gcc 2.95.2
• 2000-09-13 14:09 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-17 14:18 Re: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-19 13:09 Probably multilib -m64 problem: f77 correctness on Sparc
• 2000-09-20 15:20 Re: Trailing underscores needed
• 2000-09-23 11:33 Re: long long long
• 2000-09-25 12:30 Re: FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS
• 2000-09-26 12:27 Re: FORTRAN pointer
• 2000-09-28 11:31 Re: Status of new C++ abi

Torbjorn Granlund

• 2000-09-01 02:40 Re: PDP-10 backend for gcc

tprinceusa

• 2000-09-14 11:43 Re: GCC RPM file
• 2000-09-25 16:46 Re: FORTRAN -- LINKING PROGRAMS
• 2000-09-26 09:31 Re: gcc download

tranx nouvel

• 2000-09-27 00:42 assembly optimizations...

ucansucceed2

• 2000-09-28 21:29 Extra Money From The Comfort of Your Own Home

Ulf Carlsson

• 2000-09-02 15:12 Re: MIPS cross glibc?

Ulrich Drepper

• 2000-09-24 23:46 Re: BUG: %lc in printf fails

Ulrich Lauther

• 2000-09-22 00:48 bug report ?

Web House

• 2000-09-25 09:26 New C/C++ header for gnu C/C++ compiler

William Gacquer

• 2000-09-18 09:45 RE: Why not gnat Ada in gcc?

Yaaqov Karp

• 2000-09-19 08:42 Help with gcc to assembler compilation

Yutaka Yamauchi

• 2000-09-07 14:32 research on open-source software development

Zack Weinberg

• 2000-09-03 12:59 Re: [Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
• 2000-09-05 09:26 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-05 13:41 Re: fixincl mmap problem on Solaris
• 2000-09-05 15:09 Re: PAGESIZE
• 2000-09-06 12:06 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-06 19:18 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-06 19:19 Re: Escape sequence/parse errors
• 2000-09-09 23:25 need a tester with an old slow box
• 2000-09-10 00:25 Re: need a tester with an old slow box
• 2000-09-11 11:25 Re: varasm patch breaks sh-coff
• 2000-09-11 21:44 Re: warning: pasting would not give a valid preprocessing token
• 2000-09-12 10:06 Leaving the project indefinitely
• 2000-09-21 19:17 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-23 15:08 Re: GCC's <assert.h> and C99
• 2000-09-24 17:14 Re: macros with traditional cpp
• 2000-09-25 22:43 Re: Varargs macros subtly broken
• 2000-09-26 19:59 Status of new C++ abi
• 2000-09-27 21:35 Re: Status of new C++ abi

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)