Re: Sparc64 gcc

[Mark Hatle <fray at gate dot crashing dot org>]

Unfortunatly/fortunatly I just found them..

(Yes this doesn't belong here so I'll move to the glibc list.. but until
then..)

Apparently glibc when I choose to compile as sparc64 seems to completely
ignore the fact that it is supposed to provide those items.  I can't find
any record of the stuff in soft-fp actually compiling. :(

BTW why does this stuff exist in glibc and not gcc?  If GCC is generating
the code that requires these items, wouldn't it make more sense to contain
these in gcc?

Thank you for your help!
--Mark

On Thu, 10 Aug 2000, Richard Henderson wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 03:04:55PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote:
> > Anyway, I have the latest cvs source for that and glibc.  However I have
> > run into a snag, when linking glibc items I get:
> > /home/mhatle/libc-obj/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_Qp_div'
> > and `_Qp_stoq', `_Qp_flt', `_Qp_fne', `_Qp_qtos', `_Qp_fge', 
> > `_Qp_add', `_Qp_xtoq', `_Qp_mul', `_Qp_itoq', `_Qp_uxtoq',
> > `_Qp_sub', `_Qp_qtod', and `_Qp_feq'.
> 
> You've somehow misconfigured glibc, as they're there in 
> libc/soft-fp/sysdeps/sparc/sparc64/.
> 
> 
> r~
>