This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: set_fatal_function
- To: Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- Subject: Re: set_fatal_function
- From: Zack Weinberg <zack at wolery dot cumb dot org>
- Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2000 11:28:11 -0700
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <10007271913.AA17096@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <flu2db45b5.fsf@sel.cmla.ens-cachan.fr> <10007271913.AA17096@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu>
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 03:13:19PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote:
> Why was this removed? GNAT needs it.
On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 11:43:58PM +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes:
>
> | Why was this removed? GNAT needs it.
Because (a) it wasn't used in any code visible to me, and (b) it used
va_copy, which is not portable.
> Then it seems to be a language specific subroutine.. May I suggest it
> goes into the appropriate file in case it is to be resurected?
Depending what it does, that may or may not be possible. What does
Ada need this hook for?
<soapbox> If you'd merge GNAT into the gcc repository, this sort of
thing wouldn't happen anymore. </soapbox>
zw