This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool

To: "Mark E." <snowball3 at bigfoot dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
Date: 11 Jul 2000 17:39:59 -0300
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
References: <200007101827.UAA31352@quatramaran.ens.fr><20000710171947.A15506@liafa1.liafa.jussieu.fr><ord7kkbq3a.fsf@guarana.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><c0mmms496vl9hqnmjr4e53p6s74ch4a7jf@4ax.com>

On Jul 11, 2000, "Mark E." <snowball3@bigfoot.com> wrote:

> As of Binutils 2.10, puny ole COFF has weak symbol support so
> template static data members work just fine (when gcc is properly
> configured).

This is very good news, indeed.

Unfortunately, GNU ld doesn't support the only two platforms in which
I recall having noticed the lack of weak symbols :-(

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Marc Espie
- [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Marc Espie
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Alexandre Oliva
- Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
  - From: Mark E.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]