This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at hound dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Some inconsistency in collect2, with respect to gcc and libtool
- From: Marc Espie <Marc dot Espie at liafa dot jussieu dot fr>
- Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 22:28:45 +0200
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, David Mazieres <dm at reeducation-labor dot lcs dot mit dot edu>, Todd dot Miller at courtesan dot com, niklas at appli dot se
- References: <20000710171947.A15506@liafa1.liafa.jussieu.fr> <u9itudu4gg.fsf@hound.cygnus.com>
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 01:15:43PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> This is OK. I would also welcome a patch to do a better job; perhaps
> factoring out some of gcc.c so that collect can tell if there is a default
> rule for a file.
> Jason
Part of the problem is that gcc does not know about that, as far as I can
tell.
Looking at `%o', it looks like anything it doesn't know about is passed
to collect2... along with other specific ld options.
Looks like a mess to me.
Any idea how to go about it ?
--
Marc Espie
|anime, sf, juggling, unicycle, acrobatics, comics...
|AmigaOS, OpenBSD, C++, perl, Icon, PostScript...
| `real programmers don't die, they just get out of beta'