This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Large performance regressions from 2.95.2/3 to HEAD

To: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at
Subject: Re: Large performance regressions from 2.95.2/3 to HEAD
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 14:47:31 -0700
Cc: dan at cgsoftware dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0006291224270.8609-100000@propylaea.anduin.com><Pine.BSF.4.21.0006292331460.1804-100000@deneb.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

>>>>> "Gerald" == Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

    Gerald> On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, Daniel Berlin wrote:
    >> In every benchmark i can find, i see large performance
    >> regressions in the performance of the generated.

    Gerald> That absolutely mirrors my experience for template heavy
    Gerald> C++ code.

I am definitely aware of these issues; y'all have my solemn promise
that they will be addressed before GCC 3.0.  Note that the Stepanov
benchmark is on the list of performance release criteria.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Large performance regressions from 2.95.2/3 to HEAD
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: Large performance regressions from 2.95.2/3 to HEAD
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]