This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: linking of inline static methods

To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at loewis dot home dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
Subject: Re: linking of inline static methods
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:14:20 -0700
Cc: twhall at cuhk dot edu dot hk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <10006272205.ZM13231@mariana.arch.cuhk.edu.hk> <200006280632.IAA01038@loewis.home.cs.tu-berlin.de>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 08:32:37AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > I'm new to GNU C++ and to Linux.  (I'm coming from IRIX).  This may
> > fall under the category of "Interoperation trouble" with the Linux
> > linker, rather than a strictly GNU C++ compiler bug; I'm not sure.
> 
> Thanks for your bug report. This problem is caused by -Bsymbolic; just
> remove that option, and it will work. I believe this is a known
> problem - please contact the binutils people for further information.
> 

I don't think there is any bug in ld. In general, you don't use
-Bsymbolic unless you know what you are doing. -Bsymbolic turns the
global symbol references into local ones if there is a definition in
the shared library. That is your problem. I have no idea why you want
to use -Bsymbolic.



H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: linking of inline static methods
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

References:
- linking of inline static methods
  - From: Theodore W. Hall
- Re: linking of inline static methods
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]