This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Curiosity in sparc/sp86x-aout.h
- To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>
- Subject: Re: Curiosity in sparc/sp86x-aout.h
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 11:55:16 -0600
- cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <20000619073231.A23895@Jeffreys.suse.de>you write:
> In said file we first find
>
> #undef SUBTARGET_SWITCHES
> #define SUBTARGET_SWITCHES \
> {"big-endian", -MASK_LITTLE_ENDIAN}, \
> {"little-endian", MASK_LITTLE_ENDIAN},
>
> and then at the end of the file
>
> #undef SUBTARGET_SWITCHES
> #define SUBTARGET_SWITCHES \
> { "little-endian-data", MASK_LITTLE_ENDIAN },
>
>
> To me this looks just plain wrong and that those two SUBTARGET_SWITCHES
> should be merged. Question is, if this platform is still used and thus if
> it's worth the effort.
Yes, this config is still used (it's an embedded sparc chip).
What I think should happen is the first #undef/#define set should go away.
jeff