This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: nls patches - need help with make machinery
* Robert Lipe (robertl@sco.com) [20000605 09:40]:
> Good point. It could presumably be forced to be built on such systems
> for the maintainers of it, though, right?
No problem, you just configure with --with-included-gettext and then libintl
will be built. That's how found all the problems I've never had before.
> Should this copy of libintl generally be updated to use existing
> portability machinery in GCC?
There's a problem there. libintl comes from the gettext utils (ultimately
from glibc) and the further we diverge, the harder it gets to eventually
sync up again.
> Should we do the same for this version of libintl?
> I can help with the process if we decide to do so.
I'm still undecided. For the sake of getting rid of cruft we don't need I'd
say yes.
Philipp
--
Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
Development, SuSE GmbH, Schanzaecker Str. 10, D-90443 Nuremberg, Germany
#define NINODE 50 /* number of in core inodes */
#define NPROC 30 /* max number of processes */
-- Version 7 UNIX fuer PDP 11, /usr/include/sys/param.h