This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Testsuites

To: aj at suse dot de
Subject: Re: Testsuites
From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jun 2000 10:27:21 -0700
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
References: <20000604015652K.mitchell@codesourcery.com><u8wvk5yc0l.fsf@gromit.rhein-neckar.de>

>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:

    Andreas> What should we do with existing FAILs?  Shouldn't we mark
    Andreas> all existing FAILs as XFAILs now?  This has already
    Andreas> happened for c++ but not for the other languages.

Yes, we should.  But, we should make sure those bugs are in GNATS
before we do, especially if they are regressions from GCC 2.95.2.

--
Mark Mitchell                   mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC               http://www.codesourcery.com

References:
- Testsuites
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Testsuites
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]