This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gperf F option?
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: gperf F option?
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at NUXI dot com>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 14:47:13 -0700
- Cc: Bruno Haible <haible at ilog dot fr>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ossama Othman <othman at cs dot wustl dot edu>
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <19990831161858.11346.qmail@egcs.cygnus.com> <Pine.GSO.4.10.9908311119460.14206-100000@eos> <20000526174412.A24702@dragon.nuxi.com> <oritvzhgag.fsf@saci.lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
- Reply-To: obrien at NUXI dot com
On Sat, May 27, 2000 at 05:47:03PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 26, 2000, "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com> wrote:
>> http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#gperf
> > Is there some reason a new version of gperf cannot be released with this
> > functionality?
>
> You may try to convince the maintainer of gperf to make a new release.
> But I'm not even sure gperf has a maintainer these days.
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999 11:17:36 -0500 (CDT), Ossama Othman
<othman@cs.wustl.edu> queried egcs@egcs.cygnus.com about Gperf
maintainership in <199904261619.LAA29202@taumsauk.cs.wustl.edu>. On Thu,
29 Apr 1999 01:51:13 +0200 (MET DST) Bruno Haible <haible@ilog.fr> in
<199904282351.BAA15346@jaures.ilog.fr> claimed he was. Has this elapsed?
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)