Re: A new parallel buld patch

[Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at cygnus dot com>]

On May 18, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:

> I believe he did that on purpose.

You can believe whatever you want, but you can't prove him guilty, so
we must assume he's innocent.

> He posted his email several hours after we had concluded that my
> updated patch was ok.

It often occurs that someone reads e-mail and replies before reading
the rest of the thread, sounding totally out of context by the time
the reply shows up at everybody else's mailboxes.  I'm sure this is
what happened this time.

> That is only because he had no choices. What else could he do?

He could remain in your way :-) :-)

>> Let's please keep on this effort for cooperation.  I'm sure it's worth
>> it.

> I had more than enough with Jeff. I don't want to deal with him
> anymore.

You don't have to.  You just have to deal with the team of GCC
maintainers, posting patches with ChangeLog entries and textual
explanations of the problems they're supposed to fix.  Jeff is not the
only one who can approve or disapprove patches.  GCC is not maintained
by a single person.


But I think we've had enough of discussion, I think it was very
productive and we made good advance.  As long as you agree to
reinstate (sp?) the patch that started this whole mess, so that I can
approve it and install it.  Will you?

Thanks for your cooperation.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva    Enjoy Guaranį, see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company        aoliva@{redhat, cygnus}.com
Free Software Developer and Evangelist    CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp
oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}   Write to mailing lists, not to me