This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL
- To: Andrew Vaught <andy at xena dot eas dot asu dot edu>
- Subject: Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 20:32:57 -0600
- cc: G95 Development List <g95-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005151934390.25569-100000@xena.eas.asu.edu>you wri
te:
> On Mon, 15 May 2000, Mike Stump wrote:
>
> > > Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 03:14:48 +0200
> > > From: Philipp Thomas <pthomas@suse.de>
> > > To: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
> >
> > > So the real question seems to be, who's going to convince SGI to do
> > > the assignment, ain't it?
> >
> > I can try... I need a very specific case, with very specific goals
> > with specific benefits.
> >
>
> I'm not sure we need have SGI assign anything. All of the source
> files have GPL-2 headers in them. Is this not quite good enough?
Not good enough for inclusion into GCC. The code has to be assigned to
the FSF to be included in GCC.
jeff