gcc archive
date index for May, 2000

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

May 31, 2000
23:44 Re: gcc (anoncvs) bootstrap fails on HP-UX 11 Joerg Faschingbauer
20:47 Re: FW: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handl ing support Richard Henderson
20:45 Re: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handl ing support Richard Henderson
16:57 RE: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handling support Marc Fiuczynski
15:38 Error problem Martino Freda
15:30 Re: GCC commandline option names for thread support Mark Mitchell
15:20 GCC commandline option names for thread support David Edelsohn
15:03 Changes to the FOM Martin v. Loewis
14:54 Intent to remove old VMS wart Zack Weinberg
14:21 Re: asm. Martin v. Loewis
14:17 Re: gcc (anoncvs) bootstrap fails on HP-UX 11 Jeffrey A Law
14:11 Re: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handl ing support Jeffrey A Law
14:01 FW: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handling support Marc Fiuczynski
12:37 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Jamie Lokier
12:33 RE: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handling support Marc Fiuczynski
12:30 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Mike Stump
12:28 asm. Akbar A.
12:27 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Andi Kleen
12:16 Re: trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handling support Mike Stump
11:50 Re: Making platform specific help translatable. Martin v. Loewis
11:46 RE: gcc for a specific architecture Virgil Palanciuc
11:34 Re: Making platform specific help translatable. Andreas Schwab
11:32 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Jamie Lokier
11:30 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Gerald Pfeifer
11:25 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Mike Stump
11:03 Re: Question Mike Stump
11:01 Re: Making platform specific help translatable. Philipp Thomas
10:54 Re: Making platform specific help translatable. Martin v. Loewis
10:53 Re: gcc for a specific architecture Martin v. Loewis
10:41 Re: gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 Martin v. Loewis
10:40 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Jamie Lokier
10:33 Re: Question Martin v. Loewis
10:32 trying to glue Modula-3 onto egcs table based exception handling support Marc Fiuczynski
10:25 gcc for a specific architecture Marcio de Oliveira Buss
10:19 Making platform specific help translatable. Philipp Thomas
08:41 Question Ezequiel Munoz
07:46 gcc (anoncvs) bootstrap fails on HP-UX 11 Joerg Faschingbauer
01:54 RE: Using the tree. Virgil Palanciuc
00:28 http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html Joerg Faschingbauer

May 30, 2000
19:51 Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Mike Stump
18:58 Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Timothy J. Wood
14:58 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Mike Stump
14:45 Re: Using the tree. Joern Rennecke
14:43 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Richard Henderson
14:37 mips.c machine_dependent_reorg fix Joern Rennecke
14:22 gcc-ss-20000530 is now available law
14:20 RE: Using the tree. Mike Stump
12:07 Re: CPP warnings under DJGPP Per Bothner
11:36 CPP warnings under DJGPP Laurynas Biveinis
11:11 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Helge Hess
10:45 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
09:21 Re: GCC does not cope with my code Colin Howell
08:54 Re: Bootstrap fails with recently CVS'd sources on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard Henderson
07:50 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Jeffrey A Law
07:44 Re: CVS commit fails Philipp Thomas
07:40 [Comments?] Nightly build of GNU tool chains. (fwd) Rod Stewart
07:39 Re: CVS commit fails Franz Sirl
07:32 Re: CVS commit fails Jeffrey A Law
06:03 Re: GCC does not cope with my code Alexandre Oliva
04:20 CVS commit fails Philipp Thomas
03:19 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
00:28 Re: GCC does not cope with my code Gunnar Braun

May 29, 2000
14:14 Re: Bootstrap fails with recently CVS'd sources on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu. Richard Henderson
13:53 Bootstrap fails with recently CVS'd sources on alphaev6-unknown-linux-gnu. Toon Moene
13:53 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Toon Moene
13:15 Re: Command failed for target 'libgcc1-asm.a' Alexandre Oliva
13:05 Command failed for target 'libgcc1-asm.a' Desmond Cheung
12:14 Re: gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 Alexandre Oliva
12:13 Re: gperf F option? Alexandre Oliva
11:58 Re: gperf F option? Desmond Cheung
11:52 gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 ame
11:51 Re: gperf F option? Alexandre Oliva
11:36 Re: gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 Jeffrey A Law
11:34 Re: gperf F option? Desmond Cheung
11:32 gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 ame
11:29 gcc-2.95.2 on HP-UX 11.00 FS
10:52 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Jeffrey A Law
08:27 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Richard Kenner
08:20 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missedoptimizations Mark Mitchell
05:04 Re: Temporaries linguist-gcc
02:42 Re: Installing Cross-Compiler Erik Mouw
02:06 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Doug Evans

May 28, 2000
18:28 Re: -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Richard Henderson
18:25 Re: -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Brad Lucier
17:17 Re: Temporaries Joe Buck
16:19 Re: -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Richard Henderson
16:09 Re: -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Richard Henderson
15:08 Re: -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Martin v. Loewis
13:52 Atexit and Solaris 8 Martin v. Loewis
13:52 Re: Using the tree. Richard Henderson
13:47 Re: Memory aliasing and stack slots Richard Henderson
13:40 Re: Update in regclass.c breaks bootstrap. Richard Henderson
12:36 -ftest-coverage and .got sections on alpha Brad Lucier
11:32 Re: Using the tree. Martin v. Loewis
11:31 Re: My last question Mark Mitchell
10:56 RE: Using the tree. Virgil Palanciuc
10:11 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL (fwd) Richard Stallman
09:48 Re: Using the tree. Martin v. Loewis
09:17 RE: Insn removal. Virgil Palanciuc
08:46 Insn removal. Virgil Palanciuc
08:29 Re: How do I link libraries with g++... Alexandre Oliva
08:18 RE: Using the tree. Virgil Palanciuc
08:07 Re: gcc Martin v. Loewis
08:06 Re: Temporaries Martin v. Loewis
07:33 How do I link libraries with g++... Hendrix
07:16 Re: Updating GCC with a diff file... Alexandre Oliva
07:11 Updating GCC with a diff file... Hendrix
06:11 My last question Richard Kenner
05:47 Re: Memory aliasing and stack slots Richard Kenner
05:26 Re: Memory aliasing and stack slots Geert Bosch
05:07 Memory aliasing and stack slots Richard Kenner
04:27 Update in regclass.c breaks bootstrap. Toon Moene
04:04 Re: malloc(0) during exception throw & catch Martin v. Loewis
00:11 gcc/gcc-help Hendrix
00:04 gcc Hendrix

May 27, 2000
23:34 Re: Preprocessor Problem? Per Bothner
23:16 network problems Zack Weinberg
21:49 Re: Preprocessor Problem? Neil Booth
20:46 Re: Temporaries Joe Buck
19:55 Re: Preprocessor Problem? Zack Weinberg
17:35 Temporaries linguist-gcc
16:55 Re: Preprocessor Problem? linguist-gcc
16:12 Re: malloc(0) during exception throw & catch Denis Perchine
16:06 Re: Preprocessor Problem? Zack Weinberg
15:15 Re: working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Richard Henderson
15:07 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Richard Henderson
15:07 Re: malloc(0) during exception throw & catch Martin v. Loewis
14:55 Re: gperf F option? Alexandre Oliva
14:47 Re: gperf F option? David O'Brien
14:27 Re: Preprocessor Problem? Martin v. Loewis
13:52 Preprocessor Problem? linguist-gcc
13:48 Re: Installing Cross-Compiler Alexandre Oliva
13:47 Re: gperf F option? Alexandre Oliva
13:45 Re: SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING Alexandre Oliva
11:12 Re: Using the tree. Martin v. Loewis
03:04 Using the tree. Virgil Palanciuc
00:43 Re: Need advice on DEFAULT_VTABLE_THUNKS settings Martin v. Loewis

May 26, 2000
21:03 Need advice on DEFAULT_VTABLE_THUNKS settings David O'Brien
17:47 Re: SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING David O'Brien
17:44 Re: gperf F option? David O'Brien
17:13 Installing Cross-Compiler Desmond Cheung
15:44 working around "QImode can alias everything" missed optimizations Doug Evans
14:28 Re: IA64 EH Mark Mitchell
14:20 Re: possibly incorrect g77 syntax error message Toon Moene
14:20 Re: Question concerning libf2c and libg2c Toon Moene
13:10 Re: IA64 EH Geoff Keating
12:11 Re: possibly incorrect g77 syntax error message Emil Hallin
11:27 Snapshots? David Ronis
11:22 possibly incorrect g77 syntax error message Emil Hallin
10:26 Re: IA64 EH Andrew Macleod
10:04 Re: IA64 EH Richard Henderson
09:12 Question concerning libf2c and libg2c rlau
08:38 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
08:32 RE: OS Ports of GCC/G++ Witness
07:28 gcc Instalation Luis Morgado
06:54 Re: section placement q Jamie Lokier
05:17 Re: section placement q Andrew Morton
04:08 malloc(0) during exception throw & catch Denis Perchine
03:52 Re: section placement q Jamie Lokier
03:10 Re: Fortran Question MBGA8CSH
02:41 [Fwd: GCC for FR30!!] Tuukka Lehtonen
00:28 Re: IA64 EH Martin v. Loewis

May 25, 2000
19:03 Re: IA64 EH Richard Henderson
18:41 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
18:39 Re: configure problem Alexandre Oliva
17:43 Re: section placement q Artur Skawina
17:43 Re: section placement q Artur Skawina
17:22 Anyone working on TriMedia TM-1300 port? Or wants to? :) Paul Bunyk
16:57 IA64 EH Mark Mitchell
15:27 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Michael Matz
14:48 Re: OS Ports of GCC/G++ Mike Stump
14:34 OS Ports of GCC/G++ Witness
14:18 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
12:15 configure problem Julian Bentayeb
12:15 Re: Fortran Question Toon Moene
12:10 Re: Possible C parsing speedup? Stan Shebs
11:58 Re: Possible C parsing speedup? David Edelsohn
11:48 Re: Possible C parsing speedup? Mike Stump
11:42 Re: Fortran Question Martin v. Loewis
10:53 2.96 (20000525) benchmarks German Jose Gomez Garcia
10:20 Re: section placement q Richard Henderson
10:13 Re: IA-64 bootstrap failure Richard Henderson
10:09 Re: section placement q Jamie Lokier
07:28 Re: gcc fails to build on sparc-solaris-2.7 - autoheader missing Anthony Williams
07:15 Re: section placement q Andrew Morton
06:58 Re: section placement q Artur Skawina
06:03 Fortran Question MBGA8CSH
05:12 Re: gcc fails to build on sparc-solaris-2.7 - autoheader missing Gerald Pfeifer
05:03 gcc fails to build on sparc-solaris-2.7 - autoheader missing Anthony Williams
00:04 Re: IRIX64 6.5, gcc 2.95.1: weird inet_ntoa() behaviour Philippe De Muyter

May 24, 2000
22:08 Why no warning? (was: Re: Tree generation bug or a feature?) Ross Combs
19:18 Re: section placement q Andrew Morton
18:40 Re: section placement q Artur Skawina
16:14 Re: Possible C parsing speedup? Stan Shebs
16:10 RE: IRIX64 6.5, gcc 2.95.1: weird inet_ntoa() behaviour Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
14:57 Re: copyright assignment: joined ownership? (fwd) Richard Kenner
14:57 Re: Possible C parsing speedup? David Young
14:48 Re: copyright assignment: joined ownership? (fwd) Andy Tai
14:20 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
14:07 Possible C parsing speedup? Turly O'Connor
11:30 Re: GCC does not cope with my code Eric Christopher
10:59 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
09:40 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Matt Austern
09:06 IA-64 bootstrap failure Andrew Haley
07:51 IRIX64 6.5, gcc 2.95.1: weird inet_ntoa() behaviour Denis Vakatov
07:07 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
06:50 Serious C++ compile-time regressions Gerald Pfeifer
06:33 gcc error-"non local function uses anonymous type" Pran Joseph
06:05 Re: Tree generation bug or a feature? Nathan Sidwell
06:05 Re: Tree generation bug or a feature? Dima Volodin
05:49 Tree generation bug or a feature? Yuri Pudgorodsky
03:37 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Andi Kleen
02:35 GCC does not cope with my code Gunnar Braun
01:29 RE: Memory map. Virgil Palanciuc

May 23, 2000
21:06 お知らせ 秘書センター
15:11 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Martin v. Loewis
10:20 Re: GCC mirror Jeffrey A Law
10:16 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Stephen L Moshier
10:15 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Richard Henderson
10:05 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Matt Austern
09:31 How to make Porter-only manual Desmond Cheung
09:09 Re: enums and null pointer constants Mark Mitchell
08:44 Re: frame_pointer_needed Richard Henderson
06:40 Re: GCC mirror Gerald Pfeifer
06:29 GCC mirror Daniel Lucq
06:26 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Eric W. Biederman
06:16 frame_pointer_needed Dragos Badea
01:40 Re: enums and null pointer constants Nathan Sidwell
01:26 RE: Memory map. Virgil Palanciuc
00:50 RE: Memory map. Virgil Palanciuc

May 22, 2000
22:42 Re: enums and null pointer constants Mark Mitchell
22:28 Re: Problem with debugging information Mark Mitchell
22:00 RE: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Akbar A.
21:39 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
21:21 Re: Licenses. Benjamin Kosnik
21:16 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
19:29 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
18:51 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Stan Shebs
18:15 Re: Problem with debugging information Richard Kenner
18:06 Re: Licenses. Mike Stump
17:57 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Ian Lance Taylor
17:56 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jim Wilson
17:56 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Ian Lance Taylor
17:39 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
16:23 Question about extending specs file Ira Ruben
16:11 Re: Problem with debugging information Richard Henderson
15:50 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
15:45 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Alan Modra
15:35 Re: Looking for advice on manipulating asm code Mike Stump
15:31 Licenses. Toon Moene
15:28 Re: enums and null pointer constants Richard Kenner
15:20 Re: enums and null pointer constants Zack Weinberg
15:16 Re: Problem with debugging information Joern Rennecke
15:14 Re: enums and null pointer constants Richard Kenner
14:55 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL David Edelsohn
14:53 enums and null pointer constants Zack Weinberg
14:48 Re: Memory map. Joern Rennecke
14:45 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Mike Stump
14:41 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
14:38 Looking for advice on manipulating asm code Pankaj Pant
14:12 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL David Edelsohn
14:07 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Russ Allbery
12:54 Re: bits/string2.h Andreas Jaeger
12:43 Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Timothy J. Wood
12:37 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Bill Wendling
12:24 bits/string2.h Bill Wendling
12:14 Re: Problem with debugging information Richard Kenner
12:04 Re: Problem with debugging information Richard Henderson
11:57 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Richard Henderson
11:52 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL David Edelsohn
11:51 Re: Problem with debugging information Alexandre Oliva
11:44 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Joern Rennecke
11:35 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Bruce Korb
11:29 Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Geoff Keating
11:25 Problem with debugging information Richard Kenner
11:22 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
11:02 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Michael Matz
10:55 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
10:54 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Geoff Keating
10:43 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Mike Stump
10:38 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Jeffrey A Law
10:02 Memory map. Virgil Palanciuc
10:00 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
08:46 Re: Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Michael Matz
08:45 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Mark Mitchell
08:43 Re: Succesful installation of gcc 2.95.2 on HPUX 9.0 Tim Prince
05:07 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Alan Modra
04:25 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Andreas Schwab
03:18 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Richard Kenner
02:34 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Martin v. Loewis
02:15 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Martin v. Loewis
01:28 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Andi Kleen
00:22 Succesful installation of gcc 2.95.2 on HPUX 9.0 Glennie Hemmingsen

May 21, 2000
22:48 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Joe Buck
22:47 RE: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Akbar A.
22:10 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Joe Buck
21:51 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 H . J . Lu
21:35 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Alan Modra
21:17 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
21:00 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Geoff Keating
20:16 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Richard Henderson
19:40 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 H . J . Lu
19:01 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Alan Modra
17:59 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Richard Kenner
17:45 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mark Mitchell
17:33 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jeffrey A Law
16:30 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Alexandre Oliva
16:18 Re: SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING Alexandre Oliva
15:23 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Eric W. Biederman
14:49 Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats David Edelsohn
14:05 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Ulrich Drepper
14:01 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Marc Espie
13:43 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Ian Lance Taylor
13:37 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Ulrich Drepper
13:19 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 H . J . Lu
13:08 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
12:59 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
12:32 Fwd: Re: Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Timothy J. Wood
12:23 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Mark Mitchell
12:07 Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 Jakub Jelinek
12:02 Big find_cross_jump performance regression. Brad Lucier
11:59 A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96 H . J . Lu
10:20 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
10:07 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jason R Thorpe
09:54 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
09:48 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds
08:36 Re: Testsuite... Andreas Jaeger
06:54 Testsuite... Horst von Brand
05:30 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jeffrey A Law
03:16 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
00:04 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Linus Torvalds

May 20, 2000
21:19 RE:Re: SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING sysadm
19:19 Optimization problem on PPC when casting integers to floats Timothy J. Wood
19:18 Re: failure notice Timothy J. Wood
13:34 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:19 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Steven G. Johnson
12:53 Re: How "broken" is C complex number support? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:27 How "broken" is C complex number support? Steven G. Johnson
11:55 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
11:34 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
06:18 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
04:48 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva

May 19, 2000
20:47 Re: SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING Alexandre Oliva
20:32 Re: I would like download the C compilator for windows Alexandre Oliva
20:08 SNAPSHOT 20000508 MISSING sysadm
14:40 Re: Installing gcc-2.95.2 in HP9000 with HP/UX 10.20. Jeffrey A Law
14:24 Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under Andi Kleen
14:24 Installing gcc-2.95.2 in HP9000 with HP/UX 10.20. Eduardo Silva
14:15 [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler underGPL Tobias Schlueter
09:25 I would like download the C compilator for windows Christian Desbordes
07:13 Re: Mailing list Gerald Pfeifer
06:38 Mailing list Bazlur Rasheed
06:28 Re: String.h problem Bruno Quesnel
06:24 Re: gcc-2.95.3 April 12 incomplete C++ thunks patch breaks Linux/ia32 Mike Stump
05:17 Re: String.h problem Manfred Hollstein
04:57 Re: Function-like macro definitions Neil Booth
04:37 Re: Function-like macro definitions Branko Čibej
04:30 Re: Function-like macro definitions Branko Čibej
03:45 Function-like macro definitions Neil Booth
00:40 Re: Bootstrap failing on sparc-sun-solaris2.6 Branko Čibej
00:21 Bootstrap failing on sparc-sun-solaris2.6 Branko Čibej
00:04 Re: Anonymous structs Mumit Khan

May 18, 2000
23:21 Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Branko Čibej
20:11 Re: Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Richard Henderson
19:24 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
19:18 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mark Mitchell
19:02 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Richard Stallman
18:24 RE: Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Igor Shevlyakov
18:18 Re: Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Joern Rennecke
18:16 RE: Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Igor Shevlyakov
18:14 Re: Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Richard Kenner
18:04 Bitfields accesses (causing problems to some ARM hardware) Igor Shevlyakov
17:20 Re: divmodhi4 Michael Meissner
15:59 Re: arm.md: arm_arch4 & LDRH vs LDRB Nick Clifton
15:28 Re: divmodhi4 Joern Rennecke
15:23 divmodhi4 jeff hammond
14:51 Re: Is the new jump processing really better? Richard Henderson
14:49 Re: A new parallel buld patch Jeffrey A Law
13:45 Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Zack Weinberg
13:40 Re: A new parallel buld patch Marc Espie
13:34 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
13:30 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
13:24 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
11:54 Re: A new parallel buld patch Jeffrey A Law
11:44 Re: A new parallel buld patch Jeffrey A Law
11:31 Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Branko Čibej
11:25 Re: Configure problems (RFA) Jeffrey A Law
11:10 Re: A new parallel buld patch Philipp Thomas
11:04 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
10:40 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
10:37 Re: A new parallel buld patch Richard Henderson
10:29 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
10:28 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
09:33 Re: A new parallel buld patch Jeffrey A Law
09:00 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
08:54 Re: A new parallel buld patch Zack Weinberg
08:54 Re: Post diminator information in flow.c is not computed corectly. Michael Matz
08:28 Re: A new parallel buld patch Jeffrey A Law
08:15 Re: 1.Postdominators are computed incorectly in GCC. 2. Is there only one basic block Jason Eckhardt
08:08 1.Postdominators are computed incorectly in GCC. 2. Is there only one basic block Jason Eckhardt
08:07 Re: Configure problems (RFA) Philippe De Muyter
08:05 Re: gcc-2.95.2 Linux-> AIX Cross Compiler David Edelsohn
07:59 gcc-2.95.2 Linux-> AIX Cross Compiler Scott Dudley
07:43 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
04:54 Configure problems Branko Čibej
04:21 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Alexandre Oliva
03:42 1.Postdominators are computed incorectly in GCC. 2. Is there only one basic block that has as successor the EXIT block? Radu Bacrau
02:53 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
02:00 Post diminator information in flow.c is not computed corectly. Radu Bacrau

May 17, 2000
23:58 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
23:53 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
23:41 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
23:35 Re: A new parallel buld patch Eric Christopher
23:26 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
23:19 Is the new jump processing really better? Brad Lucier
23:12 Re: A new parallel buld patch Eric Christopher
23:06 A new libstdc++ v3 patch H . J . Lu
23:04 Re: A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
22:45 Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Branko Čibej
22:30 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
21:38 Re: A new parallel buld patch David Edelsohn
21:12 Re: A new parallel buld patch Alexandre Oliva
21:07 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Alexandre Oliva
20:13 Re: -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Zack Weinberg
18:48 -isystem vs. #pragma system_header Nathan Myers
17:21 A new parallel buld patch H . J . Lu
17:03 Re: contrib/gcc_update in CVS broken in IRIX 6.5 Jeffrey A Law
17:00 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
16:44 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
16:19 Target Description Macros Desmond Cheung
15:38 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when notcross-compiling Mark Mitchell
15:32 Re: -msoft-float and assembler... Nick Clifton
15:27 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
15:23 -msoft-float and assembler... Scott Bambrough
15:02 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
14:33 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
13:42 Re: C Cross compiler for Fairchild 9445 Mike Stump
13:15 Re: C Cross compiler for Fairchild 9445 Alan Lehotsky
13:13 Re: Parallel build of libgcc is broken. H . J . Lu
13:07 Re: contrib/gcc_update in CVS broken in IRIX 6.5 Albert Chin-A-Young
12:51 Re: Parallel build of libgcc is broken. Zack Weinberg
12:49 C Cross compiler for Fairchild 9445 Walker, Arnold
12:36 Parallel build of libgcc is broken. H . J . Lu
12:17 Re: [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when notcross-compiling Mark Mitchell
12:08 Re: varargs macros and ## Zack Weinberg
12:01 Re: varargs macros and ## Bruce Korb
11:56 Re: contrib/gcc_update in CVS broken in IRIX 6.5 Alexandre Oliva
11:51 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
11:23 Anonymous structs Mark Mitchell
11:19 varargs macros and ## Zack Weinberg
10:50 Re: String.h problem Phil Edwards
09:40 Re: String.h problem Bruno Quesnel
09:28 Compiler matching process after RTL generation Desmond Cheung
09:27 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Richard Stallman
08:48 Re: String.h problem Joe Buck
05:34 RE: debugger support for -fsquangle Daniel Berlin
05:29 contrib/gcc_update in CVS broken in IRIX 6.5 Albert Chin-A-Young
05:05 debugger support for -fsquangle Alex Hornby
04:40 Re: String.h problem Bruno Quesnel
03:47 Re: GCC FTP mirror site Gerald Pfeifer

May 16, 2000
23:27 Re: HELP!!! Martin v. Loewis
23:01 Re: Re: arm.md: arm_arch4 & LDRH vs LDRB Igor Shevlyakov
22:59 RE: String.h problem Andersson Per Ola
22:56 Re: Re: arm.md: arm_arch4 & LDRH vs LDRB Olga Karakozova
21:29 Re: arm.md: arm_arch4 & LDRH vs LDRB Michael Meissner
19:56 Re: Unnamed pattern in .md file Alan Lehotsky
19:02 arm.md: arm_arch4 & LDRH vs LDRB Igor Shevlyakov
16:59 Re: mips/abi64.h SETUP_INCOMING_VARARGS vs tm.texi Richard Henderson
16:54 mips/abi64.h SETUP_INCOMING_VARARGS vs tm.texi Joern Rennecke
16:24 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Richard Henderson
16:04 Unnamed pattern in .md file Desmond Cheung
15:24 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
15:22 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
15:13 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
15:12 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
15:01 Re: Problems when installing gcc-2.95.2 David Edelsohn
14:43 Problems when installing gcc-2.95.2 Blom Cao
14:19 Problems when installing gcc-2.95 Blom Cao
13:46 Today's CVS failed to bootstrap on Linux/ia32 H . J . Lu
13:03 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Benjamin Kosnik
12:58 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Gabriel Dos Reis
12:47 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Benjamin Kosnik
12:37 String.h problem Bruno Quesnel
12:11 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Zack Weinberg
11:59 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Nick Clifton
11:58 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
11:26 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
04:08 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
02:13 Re: Proposed minor build-process revamp to simplify cross-configuration Benjamin Kosnik
02:11 Re: Makefile llewelly
01:58 Makefile marami.sen
01:03 compile problem in current cvs Kaoru Fukui
00:54 SGI IA64 Fortran compiler: Can it legally be retargeted to RTL? Niels Kristian Bech Jensen

May 15, 2000
23:51 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
23:27 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
22:27 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Zack Weinberg
22:19 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
20:11 Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
19:54 Hello Mark Mitchell
19:42 Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jeffrey A Law
19:31 Re: [G95-develop] Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler underGPL Andrew Vaught
19:14 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
18:14 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Philipp Thomas
16:29 FW: LAPACK 3.0 and gcc 3.0 regression testing Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:15 Re: cp/inc licensing Jeffrey A Law
16:12 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Mike Stump
15:43 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Andi Kleen
15:36 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
15:26 Re: Maintainers -- now what? (was RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanis m) Jeffrey A Law
15:23 Re: How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? Loren James Rittle
14:30 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Jeffrey A Law
13:55 Test results with libstdc++ v3 H . J . Lu
13:45 Re: SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Toon Moene
13:00 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order Jeffrey A Law
10:56 Re: section placement q Linus Torvalds
10:16 SGI releases IA64 C C++ and F90 compiler under GPL Dan Nicolaescu
09:15 HELP!!! Michael Michael
07:02 FW: GNU gcc/g++ message: inst emulated pid=31963 <g++> va=0x0 pc=0x12000b7c0 inst=0x523f0482 Bury, John G.
04:07 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order nicola
01:52 experimental results of branch predictions 2 Jan Hubicka

May 14, 2000
23:39 RE: Declaration of static friend function Mevorach, Assaf
19:58 Re: 'gcc' Software David Starner
19:40 Re: section placement q Graham Stoney
13:14 Experimental results of the branch predictors Jan Hubicka
11:18 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Jeffrey A Law
10:40 probs building gcc-2.95.2 on old SGI/Irix toolset Gary Funck
10:28 Re: Declaration of static friend function Martin v. Loewis
09:46 Declaration of static friend function Mevorach, Assaf
08:56 Re: 'gcc' Software Marc Espie

May 13, 2000
21:47 Re: section placement q Andrew Morton
16:42 20000508 Snapshot still incomplete and unusable Tim Josling
14:28 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Michael Sokolov
14:25 Re: Performance of gc-simple Michael Sokolov
13:58 Re: CDROM Martin v. Loewis
12:57 Re: CDROM Gerald Pfeifer
12:37 CDROM Rafael Pirela
11:32 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Michael Sokolov
11:15 Re: Bug in mklibgcc.in ? Michael Sokolov
10:13 Re: Proposed minor build-process revamp to simplify cross-configuration H . J . Lu
09:59 Re: Proposed minor build-process revamp to simplify cross-configuration Jeffrey A Law
08:02 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Marek Michalkiewicz
08:02 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Marek Michalkiewicz
07:33 Re: Linkinging Assembler with C++ Martin v. Loewis
05:57 Linkinging Assembler with C++ Jhann skarsson
04:31 RE: Note handling in haifa-sched. Virgil Palanciuc

May 12, 2000
17:45 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Michael Meissner
17:34 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
16:18 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Joern Rennecke
16:16 How do I run "make check" in gcc with libstdc++-v3? H . J . Lu
16:11 Re: gcc question on alpha-dec-osf5 Alexandre Oliva
15:57 Re: GCC C++ Dec Docs Martin v. Loewis
15:44 Re: 2.95 branch, can't build libstdc++ Martin v. Loewis
15:36 gcc question on alpha-dec-osf5 Helen Wang
15:07 Re: [Q] inclusion order problems Tim Prince
14:59 Re: Large size of C++ v3 libs llewelly
14:54 A patch for libobjc H . J . Lu
14:47 binutils 2.9.5.0.42 is released. H . J . Lu
14:46 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates biggerbinaries than MSVC Mike Stump
14:11 Re: [Q] inclusion order problems Mike Stump
13:32 Re: Cygwin v1.1.1 + gcc snapshots/CVS building tip Mumit Khan
13:32 Re: Large size of C++ v3 libs H . J . Lu
13:15 Re: Large size of C++ v3 libs llewelly
13:03 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Denis Chertykov
13:02 Re: avr-gcc build fails on fp-bit.c Denis Chertykov
12:31 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
12:23 Re: Courses Mike Stump
12:22 Build on intel, solaris 2.8 Scott Boone
12:18 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Mike Stump
11:53 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Joern Rennecke
11:50 mirror problems for 2000-05-08 snapshot Joe Van Andel
11:48 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Zack Weinberg
10:56 Cygwin v1.1.1 + gcc snapshots/CVS building tip Mumit Khan
10:12 Re: Bug in arm-elf-gcc Richard Henderson
09:53 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Joern Rennecke
09:50 Re: Arrange for gcc_update re-execs itself before touching files Jeffrey A Law
09:47 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
09:41 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
09:38 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
09:16 [Q] operators and conversion problem Miljenko Cvjetko
09:15 Re: Proposed minor build-process revamp to simplify cross-configuration H . J . Lu
09:07 Re: optimisation problem with sqrt Tim Prince
08:48 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Richard Henderson
08:33 Re: Note handling in haifa-sched. Richard Henderson
05:55 Re: optimisation problem with sqrt Sylvain Zimmermann
05:39 avr-gcc build fails on fp-bit.c Marek Michalkiewicz
04:19 Re: optimisation problem with sqrt Christian Hggstrm
04:14 Re: Function Prologue and epilogue Christian Hggstrm
03:37 GCC C++ Dec Docs Jon Bennett
02:42 Proposed minor build-process revamp to simplify cross-configuration Loren James Rittle
02:16 [Q] inclusion order problems Miljenko Cvjetko
02:15 Large size of C++ v3 libs Ryszard Kabatek
02:12 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
02:12 [Q] inclusion order problems Miljenko Cvjetko
02:07 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
01:56 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Zack Weinberg
01:56 Courses Madi Marzuq
01:48 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
01:10 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Jan Hubicka
00:59 Re: x86 branch cost Jan Hubicka
00:52 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Zack Weinberg
00:45 Re: g++ and sockets llewelly
00:25 x86 branch cost Marek Michalkiewicz
00:15 g++ and sockets Neil Curran

May 11, 2000
23:46 Arrange for gcc_update re-execs itself before touching files Alexandre Oliva
23:32 Re: Bug in arm-elf-gcc Eric Christopher
22:51 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Ken Pizzini
19:54 Re: Q: linker "-static" flag usage Alexandre Oliva
19:01 Re: section placement q Linus Torvalds
18:53 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Mike Stump
18:25 Bug in arm-elf-gcc Soh Kok Hong
18:19 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Michael Meissner
18:15 section placement q Andrew Morton
17:14 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Jeffrey A Law
16:50 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Jeffrey A Law
15:33 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Mike Stump
15:29 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
15:23 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
15:18 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Richard Henderson
15:10 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
14:58 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
14:53 Re: Q: linker "-static" flag usage Denis Vakatov
14:32 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Jeffrey A Law
14:25 Re: bootstrap failure on sun sparc solaris Mike Stump
13:56 Re: Alignment and preprocessor directives Mike Stump
13:56 Re: Q: linker "-static" flag usage Alexandre Oliva
13:55 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Bruce Korb
13:47 Re: Q: linker "-static" flag usage H . J . Lu
13:45 Re: 'gcc' Software Alexandre Oliva
13:39 bootstrap failure on sun sparc solaris Mike Stump
13:15 Re: (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Mike Stump
12:45 Q: linker "-static" flag usage Denis Vakatov
12:29 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Robert Lipe
12:12 Alignment and preprocessor directives Jiann-Ming Su
11:32 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Jeffrey A Law
11:32 Maintainers -- now what? (was RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism) Donn Terry
11:31 Re: Optimization Jeffrey A Law
11:26 Re: Note handling in haifa-sched. Richard Henderson
11:21 Optimization Thomas, Robert S
11:12 Re: Note handling in haifa-sched. Richard Henderson
11:12 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Bruce Korb
09:52 Re: gcc/as Tim Prince
09:18 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Jeffrey A Law
09:14 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
09:04 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Jamie Lokier
08:51 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Jamie Lokier
08:50 Re: Suggestions for extended asm Jamie Lokier
08:49 Re: List of Supported Platforms (was: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Gerald Pfeifer
08:47 Re: -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Dave Brolley
08:10 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Robert Lipe
08:07 Re: gcc/as Jeffrey A Law
07:53 Re: 'gcc' Software Janet Casey
07:49 fixinc now has a "check" facility... Bruce Korb
07:40 Re: GCC FTP mirror site David O'Brien
07:34 Re: 'gcc' Software Janet Casey
07:18 Pentium III support Michael M. Morrison
06:21 20000508 g++ fails to compile mux function. Robert
06:15 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Jamie Lokier
05:07 How to build PA64 compiler? Jan Hubicka
03:35 gcc/as Simon Imre
03:28 -traditional comment elimination (yuk...) Neil Booth
02:45 optimisation problem with sqrt Sylvain ZIMMERMANN
02:19 RE: Note handling in haifa-sched. Virgil Palanciuc
02:07 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Jan Hubicka
01:59 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
01:50 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Nathan Sidwell
01:25 (-Os versus -O2 relation) Was: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Jan Hubicka
00:58 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Akim Demaille
00:53 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Akim Demaille
00:50 Problem with --enable-libstdcxx-v3, egcs-20000501 on RedHat 6.0 Dr. Andreas Stuebinger
00:21 Changing high priority PRs Martin v. Loewis

May 10, 2000
23:55 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Jan Hubicka
23:36 RE: Note handling in haifa-sched. Virgil Palanciuc
23:34 gcc snapshot 20000508 broken Thorsten Kranzkowski
23:25 Re: GCC FTP mirror site Jeffrey A Law
23:14 Re: GCC FTP mirror site Mike Stump
22:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
22:50 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Jeffrey A Law
22:47 Re: 'gcc' Software Martin v. Loewis
20:42 Re: branch predictions Joern Rennecke
20:28 GCC FTP mirror site David O'Brien
19:56 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Joe Buck
19:36 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Graham Stoney
19:34 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Robert Lipe
18:23 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
17:55 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Jeffrey A Law
17:50 Re: 'gcc' Software Ross Smith
17:39 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
17:16 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
17:08 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
16:46 RE: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
16:46 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
16:41 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Richard Henderson
16:39 Re: Bug in mklibgcc.in ? Richard Henderson
16:20 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
16:18 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
16:11 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Joern Rennecke
16:08 Re: 'gcc' Software Joe Buck
15:29 Re: 'gcc' Software Bruce Korb
14:41 Re: 'gcc' Software Martin v. Loewis
14:41 Re: -Wimplicit-signed-char Russell King
14:24 GNU make options (was Re: if-conversion ...) Joe Buck
14:22 Re: Avoid __main from being called in main()? Mike Stump
14:17 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Joern Rennecke
14:09 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Martin v. Loewis
13:37 Re: 'gcc' Software Zack Weinberg
13:21 'gcc' Software Janet Casey
13:14 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
12:58 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
12:34 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Paul D. Smith
12:29 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Paul D. Smith
12:28 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers John Vickers
12:09 Re: Note handling in haifa-sched. Richard Henderson
11:58 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Martin v. Loewis
11:46 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Mike Stump
11:46 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
11:33 Re: leave instruction on ppro/pII/pIII Lee Iverson
11:15 Re: leave instruction on ppro/pII/pIII Alexander Sokolov
11:09 Note handling in haifa-sched. Virgil Palanciuc
11:06 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Phil Edwards
11:04 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Jan Hubicka
10:54 unformatted data Paula Vigliarolo
10:49 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Joe Buck
10:42 Re: leave instruction on ppro/pII/pIII John Vickers
10:28 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Jeffrey A Law
10:23 Re: leave instruction on ppro/pII/pIII Jeffrey A Law
10:23 Re: expected_retval attribute proposal Martin v. Loewis
10:18 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Paul D. Smith
10:10 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Paul D. Smith
09:52 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Jeffrey A Law
09:43 Re: Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Branko Čibej
09:36 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Joe Buck
09:31 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
09:30 Re: Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Joe Buck
09:19 Re: 20000508 g++ fails to compile mux function. Alexandre Oliva
09:01 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Phil Edwards
08:50 20000508 g++ fails to compile mux function. Robert
08:34 New fix method and a fixinc "make check" Bruce Korb
08:30 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Andreas Schwab
08:11 Re: Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Neil Booth
08:01 Re: Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Dave Brolley
07:46 Re: -Wimplicit-signed-char Andreas Schwab
07:04 Re: Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Neil Booth
06:48 Trigraphs expanding in comment regions? Yuri Pudgorodsky
06:34 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Bruce Korb
05:04 Re: Avoid __main from being called in main()? Alexandre Oliva
04:45 Avoid __main from being called in main()? Henrik Bergstrom
04:06 i386-sequent-sysv4 Successful Pimanenok
03:58 leave instruction on ppro/pII/pIII Alexander Sokolov
02:04 expected_retval attribute proposal Jan Hubicka
01:38 Suggestions for extended asm Marek Michalkiewicz
00:17 Re: Using compiler Martin v. Loewis
00:12 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis

May 09, 2000
23:36 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Graham Stoney
23:23 Re: gcc and g++ on HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
21:59 Re: gcc and g++ on HP-UX 10.20 Priya Narasimhan
21:20 RE: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:58 today's flow.c change breaks build. Robert Lipe
18:39 Re: How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Jeffrey A Law
18:10 Re: gcc and g++ on HP-UX 10.20 Alexandre Oliva
17:44 gcc and g++ on HP-UX 10.20 Priya Narasimhan
15:36 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Russ Allbery
15:17 Using compiler denise
15:04 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order H . J . Lu
14:49 Re: info Mike Stump
14:44 Re: OSR 5 bootstrap fails. Bruce Korb
14:43 How does one identify HP-UX with broken inline math funs? Bruce Korb
14:17 Increasing the mailing list limits Martin v. Loewis
14:02 Re: info Martin v. Loewis
13:53 Re: Compiler Error Jeffrey A Law
13:47 Re: SUN folks.... Martin v. Loewis
13:41 OSR 5 bootstrap fails. Jean-Pierre Radley
13:40 Compiler Error Richard Xu
12:54 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
12:12 Re: Core dump when a shared object is throwing an exception Martin v. Loewis
12:07 Re: Bug report: objc classes linked in wrong order H . J . Lu
11:56 info Akbar A.
11:42 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Felix Lee
10:57 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Bruce Korb
10:35 Re: New OSR5/GCC problem Bruce Korb
10:28 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
10:25 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
10:16 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Michael Meissner
09:33 Core dump when a shared object is throwing an exception Gilles Brunet
09:31 Re: Small sibbling call tweak Richard Henderson
09:19 Re: Memory layout (novice questions). Joern Rennecke
09:10 SUN folks.... Bruce Korb
08:47 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Phil Edwards
08:15 Small sibbling call tweak Jan Hubicka
08:01 Re: GCC for the motorola PowerPC in particular the MPC555 David Edelsohn
05:13 GCC for the motorola PowerPC in particular the MPC555 Darren Horne
03:44 Re: streambuf again. Andris Pavenis
03:32 streambuf again. Temporary Development
01:40 [Q] g++2.95.2 BUG Namespace and scoping 2 Miljenko Jr. Jurica Cvjetko mo
01:40 [Q] g++2.95.2 BUG Namespace and scoping Miljenko Jr. Jurica Cvjetko mo
00:53 Bug in mklibgcc.in ? Denis Chertykov

May 08, 2000
22:24 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Jeffrey A Law
21:20 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Michael Sokolov
21:15 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Michael Sokolov
20:15 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Robert Lipe
19:50 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Russ Allbery
18:47 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Russ Allbery
18:04 RE: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Donn Terry
17:02 RE: gcc-ss-20000508 is now available Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:01 mips coff compiler? Reed Kotler
16:54 gcc-ss-20000508 is now available law
15:05 Re: Free Translation Project Philipp Thomas
14:27 Re: bugs in vax and tahoe ports Richard Henderson
13:49 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Paul Eggert
12:33 bugs in vax and tahoe ports Denis Chertykov
12:06 Re: Free Translation Project Martin v. Loewis
12:03 Re: Fixinc problem Zack Weinberg
11:59 Re: Fixinc problem Zack Weinberg
11:57 Re: Fixinc problem Bruce Korb
11:15 Re: Free Translation Project Mike Stump
10:37 Re: Free Translation Project Mike Stump
10:25 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Mike Stump
10:03 Re: DJGPP & fixincludes Laurynas Biveinis
09:43 Re: List of Supported Platforms (was: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Martin v. Loewis
09:25 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Jamie Lokier
09:24 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Richard Henderson
09:22 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Jeffrey A Law
09:20 Re: cp/inc licensing Benjamin Kosnik
09:15 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Christian Iseli
09:07 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Christian Iseli
09:03 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Joe Buck
09:03 DJGPP & fixincludes Bruce Korb
08:56 Fixinc problem Richard Kenner
08:54 Re: List of Supported Platforms (was: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Joe Buck
07:44 Re: Free Translation Project Martin v. Loewis
07:14 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Mo McKinlay
06:57 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Per Bothner
06:50 Re: Free Translation Project Michael Meissner
05:59 Re: rfc: new libgcc build mechanism Michael Sokolov
02:29 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Christian Iseli

May 07, 2000
21:58 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio peeterj
20:47 Re: cp/inc licensing Richard Stallman
19:08 Feedback on "LAPACK build and test guide" Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
17:26 [PATCH] Make --enable-nls the default when not cross-compiling Philipp Thomas
17:18 Re: Free Translation Project Philipp Thomas
16:29 Re: Free Translation Project Philipp Thomas
15:54 Re: Free Translation Project Tom Tromey
15:53 Re: Free Translation Project Tom Tromey
15:11 Re: Free Translation Project Martin v. Loewis
14:33 Re: Free Translation Project Philipp Thomas
14:17 Re: Free Translation Project Geoff Keating
14:06 Re: Free Translation Project Martin v. Loewis
12:56 Re: g++ 2.95.2 calculates wrong size for class Martin v. Loewis
12:36 Re: List of Supported Platforms (was: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Martin v. Loewis
12:18 List of Supported Platforms (was: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Gerald Pfeifer
11:30 Re: Free Translation Project Philipp Thomas
11:21 Life and death of dyn-string.[ch] ? Marc Espie
10:19 Free Translation Project Tom Tromey
08:33 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Mark E.
04:13 Added documentation on building/testing LAPACK 3.0 on GCC-3.0 criteria page Toon Moene

May 06, 2000
22:01 Function Prologue and epilogue Fu-hau Hsu
10:24 Re: Perfomance of gc-simple Jamie Lokier
03:26 Re: Internal Compiler Error on Recently CVS'd sources in libstdc++-v3 on Alpha. Branko Čibej
00:37 Perfomance of gc-simple Laurynas Biveinis

May 05, 2000
19:04 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Michael Hayes
18:21 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Michael Matz
18:15 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Ton Hospel
17:05 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Jeffrey A Law
16:10 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Michael Matz
15:51 Re: g++ 2.95.2 calculates wrong size for class Sean Cavanaugh
15:39 Re: g++ 2.95.2 calculates wrong size for class Horst von Brand
14:53 Re: flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Jeffrey A Law
14:36 Re: case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Martin v. Loewis
14:32 flow_d_f_o_compute misnamed? (was: if-conversion a performance...) Michael Matz
14:07 Re: Problem building fixinc Bruce Korb
13:46 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
13:35 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Gerald Pfeifer
13:12 Re: Problem building fixinc Philippe De Muyter
12:01 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Jeffrey A Law
10:37 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Richard Henderson
09:32 Internal Compiler Error on Recently CVS'd sources in libstdc++-v3 on Alpha. Toon Moene
09:26 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Jeffrey A Law
08:35 case where gcc generates bigger binaries than MSVC Mat Hostetter
08:22 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Michael Alan Dorman
08:18 Re: Problem building fixinc Bruce Korb
08:09 binutils 2.9.5.0.41 is released. H . J . Lu
08:01 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Daniel Jacobowitz
07:04 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Marc Espie
06:12 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
05:29 ホームページを見せていただきました ciw
04:06 Problem building fixinc Richard Kenner
02:43 Looking for ARM/gcc guru Vadim Lebedev
01:38 Re: Namespace related g++ test failures with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Martin v. Loewis
01:17 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Martin v. Loewis
00:44 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Richard Henderson
00:39 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Christian Iseli
00:17 Re: ARM syntax in gcc? Martin v. Loewis

May 04, 2000
23:28 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Mathias Froehlich
22:58 Re: Help with global partitions Mike Stump
22:35 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Richard Henderson
22:32 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Mike Stump
22:16 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Richard Henderson
22:05 Namespace related g++ test failures with --enable-libstdcxx-v3 Loren James Rittle
20:46 Help with global partitions GUTIERREZ, MARK L
19:39 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
19:20 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Ton Hospel
18:06 Re: Avoid random block reorderings Jeffrey A Law
18:06 DEPENDENCIES_OUTPUT misdocumented? Jamie Lokier
17:10 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Gerald Pfeifer
17:04 Re: ARM syntax in gcc? Neelakanth
16:57 --enable-checking test failures, i686-pc-linux-gnu Zack Weinberg
15:44 Re: Avoid random block reorderings Geoff Keating
15:31 Re: ARM syntax in gcc? Martin v. Loewis
14:31 Re: ARM syntax in gcc? Neelakanth
14:28 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Martin v. Loewis
14:09 Re: ARM syntax in gcc? Nick Clifton
14:08 Re: branch predictions Andreas Jaeger
14:01 Re: branch predictions Richard Henderson
13:57 Re: branch predictions Andi Kleen
13:48 ARM syntax in gcc? Neelakanth Nadgir
13:46 Re: branch predictions Jamie Lokier
12:49 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Richard Henderson
12:48 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Richard Henderson
12:47 Re: problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Richard Henderson
12:41 Re: GCC compiler intrinsics. Richard Henderson
12:31 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Richard Henderson
12:30 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Michael Alan Dorman
12:29 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Michael Meissner
12:16 Re: AVR signed int / 2 divide Jeffrey A Law
12:12 Re: AVR signed int / 2 divide Marek Michalkiewicz
11:55 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Richard Henderson
11:49 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Gerald Pfeifer
11:46 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Michael Matz
11:08 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Richard Earnshaw
11:02 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Michael Meissner
10:43 RE: inline asm and status flags on x86 Geoff Berry
08:58 Re: AVR signed int / 2 divide Jeffrey A Law
08:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Jeffrey A Law
08:51 problem with __dso_handle on Linux/alpha Christian Iseli
08:43 Re: branch predictions Jeffrey A Law
08:33 Re: /f flag in RTL Jeffrey A Law
08:31 Re: branch predictions Mark Mitchell
08:24 Re: branch predictions Jeffrey A Law
08:13 Re: branch predictions Jeffrey A Law
08:06 Re: branch predictions Jeffrey A Law
08:00 Re: branch predictions Jason Eckhardt
07:42 Re: some 64-bit-ness in libio Jakub Jelinek
07:40 Re: branch predictions Mark Mitchell
07:35 some 64-bit-ness in libio Christian Iseli
07:32 Re: branch predictions Mark Mitchell
06:56 Re: branch predictions Jason Eckhardt
06:49 download C compiler FeliceGata
06:40 Re: branch predictions Jason Eckhardt
06:23 Re: GCC compiler intrinsics. Mike Stump
06:18 Re: GCC compiler intrinsics Robert Lipe
05:13 Dynamic linker HM Nesbit
03:42 /f flag in RTL Dragos Badea
03:34 GCC compiler intrinsics Andy Hanson
03:30 AVR signed int / 2 divide Marek Michalkiewicz
02:55 GCC compiler intrinsics. Andy Hanson
02:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Wolfram Gloger
02:24 Re: branch predictions Andi Kleen
02:13 Re: PDP-11 port? lars brinkhoff
02:11 branch predictions Jeffrey A Law

May 03, 2000
20:05 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
18:14 Re: reduced testcase for dwarf1 ICE Jeffrey A Law
17:19 Re: Updated release criteria Horst von Brand
15:27 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds sidster
15:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Richard Henderson
15:05 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Martin v. Loewis
14:57 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Robert Lipe
14:42 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Richard Henderson
14:40 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mike Stump
13:25 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support Geoff Keating
13:19 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mike Stump
13:13 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Geoff Keating
12:40 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
12:30 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
12:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mumit Khan
12:09 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
12:09 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
12:08 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
12:02 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
11:52 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
11:44 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
11:17 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
11:11 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
10:58 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
10:56 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
10:49 Updated release criteria Mark Mitchell
10:42 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mumit Khan
10:38 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
10:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
10:31 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Greg McGary
10:26 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
10:25 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
10:22 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mumit Khan
10:21 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
10:15 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
10:13 Re: Secondary platform nomination (was Re: GCC 3.0 ReleaseCriteria) Mark Mitchell
10:12 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support Mark Mitchell
10:10 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
10:07 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Jeffrey A Law
10:01 Vacation Mark Mitchell
10:00 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
09:55 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Jeffrey A Law
09:55 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
09:50 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
09:39 Re: minor code-quality regression vs. 2.95 Jeffrey A Law
09:26 Re: gcc help / bug Alexandre Oliva
08:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Jeffrey A Law
08:34 gcc help / bug Dave Gress
08:30 Re: MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Mark Mitchell
08:25 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Jeffrey A Law
08:20 Re: PDP-11 port? Jeffrey A Law
08:14 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds H . J . Lu
08:12 Re: problems linking g++-generated win32 dlls with VC++ applications Mumit Khan
07:40 MEM_COPY_ATTRIBUTES Richard Kenner
07:27 Re: ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Dave Brolley
06:07 Re: PDP-11 port? Richard Kenner
05:50 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
03:49 Re: PDP-11 port? Michael Sokolov
03:27 PDP-11 port? lars brinkhoff
02:30 ssh often hangs where pserver succeeds Greg McGary
02:24 Re: problems linking g++-generated win32 dlls with VC++ applications Marat Boshernitsan
00:19 Re: problems linking g++-generated win32 dlls with VC++ applications Marat Boshernitsan

May 02, 2000
23:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Charles M. Hannum
23:33 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
23:18 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
22:58 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Michael Matz
22:55 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mumit Khan
22:20 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
22:12 Re: problems linking g++-generated win32 dlls with VC++ applications Mumit Khan
22:01 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Charles M. Hannum
21:24 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
20:54 problems linking g++-generated win32 dlls with VC++ applications Marat Boshernitsan
20:49 reduced testcase for dwarf1 ICE Robert Lipe
20:20 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Trevor Yann
18:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria John Wehle
18:31 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mike Stump
17:32 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Richard Henderson
17:30 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? John Wehle
17:21 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Richard Henderson
17:03 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
16:57 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? John Wehle
16:44 Re: A shared version of libgcc Martin v. Loewis
15:00 Re: GCC policy question Jeffrey A Law
14:44 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Marc Espie
14:43 Re: g77/f77 Toon Moene
14:11 fine grained bounds checking patches for egcs-20000501 William Bader
13:54 Re: cp/inc licensing Jim Wilson
13:41 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Richard Henderson
13:35 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Jeffrey A Law
13:17 g77/f77 Labao Lan
12:29 Re: CXX Success Stories ??? Brad Lucier
11:50 Re: A shared version of libgcc Geoff Keating
11:24 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Richard Earnshaw
11:17 RE: inline asm and status flags on x86 Geoff Berry
11:00 Re: map,const keytype llewelly
10:32 Re: inline asm and status flags on x86 Jeffrey A Law
10:02 inline asm and status flags on x86 Geoff Berry
09:43 map,const keytype Anjul Srivastava
09:42 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Michael Meissner
09:36 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Joe Buck
09:14 Re: cp/inc licensing Jeffrey A Law
07:54 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment Mike Stump
05:49 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment David Young
05:45 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Michael Matz
04:03 Re: A shared version of libgcc Nick Ing-Simmons
03:04 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Frank Moehle
02:02 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment Martin v. Loewis
01:42 Re: A shared version of libgcc Martin v. Loewis
01:15 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis

May 01, 2000
23:53 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Andreas Jaeger
22:24 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Richard Henderson
21:56 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? John Wehle
21:25 Re: How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? Michael Meissner
21:22 Re: patch for libf2c's use of gcc's internal headers. (part 1 of 3) Jeffrey A Law
21:10 How early are COND_EXEC patterns created? John Wehle
21:07 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment Jeffrey A Law
18:42 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment Mike Stump
18:10 Re: cp/inc licensing Mark Mitchell
18:01 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
17:42 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mike Stump
17:36 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment David Young
17:15 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Mitchell
17:12 Re: Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment Stan Shebs
16:58 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Kettenis
16:58 Re: cp/inc licensing Richard Stallman
16:58 Re: cp/inc licensing Richard Stallman
16:54 gcc-ss-20000501 is now available law
16:48 Re: patch for libf2c's use of gcc's internal headers. (part 1 of 3) Gerald Pfeifer
16:46 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Kettenis
16:35 Was that the (a?) "standard" copyright assignment David Young
16:23 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Mitchell
16:12 Re: A shared version of libgcc Richard Henderson
16:12 Re: patch for libf2c's use of gcc's internal headers. (part 1 of 3) Stan Shebs
16:09 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Horst von Brand
16:04 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Mitchell
16:00 Re: patch for libf2c's use of gcc's internal headers. (part 1 of 3) Michael Meissner
15:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support Martin v. Loewis
15:34 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria (HylaFax) Martin v. Loewis
15:32 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
15:29 Re: if-conversion a performance bottleneck Richard Henderson
15:28 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mike Stump
15:27 Re: A shared version of libgcc Richard Henderson
15:14 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Martin v. Loewis
14:57 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Mike Stump
14:53 Re: where is gcc-lib? Martin v. Loewis
14:26 Secondary platform nomination (was Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria) Kaveh R. Ghazi
14:16 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Andreas Jaeger
14:08 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Jeffrey A Law
14:05 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Jeffrey A Law
13:52 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
13:49 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
13:46 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
13:45 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
13:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Richard Henderson
13:35 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support David O'Brien
13:27 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
13:22 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
13:17 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
13:07 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
12:57 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
12:51 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support Daniel Jacobowitz
12:43 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
12:42 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria David O'Brien
12:14 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Mark Mitchell
12:08 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria (HylaFax) Reg Clemens
11:56 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Steinar Bang
11:41 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria Gerald Pfeifer
11:26 Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria and PPC Linux support Kevin B. Hendricks
10:54 if-conversion a performance bottleneck Brad Lucier
10:38 suggest backporting fix for C++ asm ("..." :: "x") to 2.95 Zack Weinberg
10:34 Re: Some GCC files still using GPLv1 Jeffrey A Law
10:27 Re: A shared version of libgcc Geoff Keating
10:17 Re: Web: Making GNATS fixes a release criterion Mark Mitchell
09:58 Re: Web: Making GNATS fixes a release criterion Martin v. Loewis
09:27 where is gcc-lib? UMinKyaw
09:07 Re: A shared version of libgcc Mark Kettenis
08:53 Re: Web: Making GNATS fixes a release criterion Mark Mitchell
08:38 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Geert Bosch
08:30 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Jeffrey A Law
08:25 Re: Web: Making GNATS fixes a release criterion Gerald Pfeifer
06:56 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers John Vickers
05:59 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Martin v. Loewis
05:07 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Alan Cox
05:02 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Bradley D. LaRonde
04:48 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Gerald Pfeifer
04:29 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers George Anzinger
04:28 Web: Making GNATS fixes a release criterion Martin v. Loewis
03:27 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Tigran Aivazian
03:23 Re: Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Tigran Aivazian
02:59 Automaticly eliminating redundant zero initialisers Graham Stoney


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.5