This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria

To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 16:45:06 -0700
Cc: dje at watson dot ibm dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200004302255.SAA29998@mal-ach.watson.ibm.com> <20000430163108V.mitchell@codesourcery.com>

On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 04:31:08PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> So, in all cases, the additional burden is minor: the burden of
> shipping a shared libgcc is never introduced where the application was
> not already shipping a shared library in the first place.

I believe what David is concerned about is not a company distributing
a product, but Billy Joe giving Bobby Rae a new build of dustydeck.exe
to try out on last week's collected crystal growth data.  I.e. two
random users collaborating on different machines.

I've also just replied to David's message with a scheme that might 
help us automatically select the proper behaviour in such cases.

r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: David Edelsohn
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]