This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria

To: hjl at lucon dot org
Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2000 11:51:44 -0700
CC: chip at valinux dot com, libc-hacker at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
References: <200004271445.KAA13474@caip.rutgers.edu> <20000427095256.C11838@cygnus.com> <20000427173305.J570@perlsupport.com> <20000427174246.C12403@cygnus.com> <20000427184257.M570@perlsupport.com> <20000427195828.A29636@lucon.org>

> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 19:58:28 -0700
> From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>

> If there is a libgcc.so, I prefer it is called something else and
> installed under /lib on Linux. We may have other compilers and
> /usr may not be mounted during boot. I can live with libcompilers.so.

Which other compilers do you expect will need libgcc.a?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@cygnus.com>

References:
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Chip Salzenberg
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Chip Salzenberg
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]