This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria

To: "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn at galileo dot thp dot univie dot ac dot at>,"GCC Mailing List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
From: "Tim Prince" <tprince at computer dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 13:02:20 -0700
Cc: "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn at galileo dot thp dot univie dot ac dot at>
References: <20000425235511A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <200004261748.TAA26998@davinci.thp.univie.ac.at>

Besides, the emphasis properly is on the performance of some
applications of importance to the gcc community, rather than on
whether the compiler overcomes the specific bottlenecks of one
test suite for which several commercial compilers have specific
accomodations.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Thornburg" <jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at>
> One other idea... if it weren't for the problems of non-free
test code,
> I think the SPEC CPU2000 benchmark suite would be a *great*
set of
> application tests.  However, many testers won't have access to
the SPEC
> code (which costs money), so this may not be practical.
>
> --
> -- Jonathan Thornburg <jthorn@galileo.thp.univie.ac.at>
>    http://www.thp.univie.ac.at/~jthorn/home.html
>    Universitaet Wien (Vienna, Austria) / Institut fuer
Theoretische Physik

References:
- GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.0 Release Criteria
  - From: Jonathan Thornburg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]