This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case


In article <8e69eb$pa6$1@clipper.ens.fr> you write:
>>>>>> Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> writes:

> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:03:59PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> That would require porting tables to all targets.

> > Yes.  Surely you're not suggesting this is an unworthy goal?

>Not at all, just making sure you understand the consequences.  :)

> > And probably not so bad if we mothball some of the truely 
> > ancient ports at the same time.

>It probably wouldn't hurt to just disable EH on targets that don't support
>the new scheme.

It *does* hurt.

Or are you volunteering to get OpenBSD platforms to handle non-sjlj 
exceptions ?

OpenBSD users do need exceptions (heck, I know I do).

We already have quite a few other issues to deal with...

Put simply, killing sjlj without helping us cope means we will be stuck with
gcc 2.95.*.

Not a threat, plain reality.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]