This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case
In article <8e69eb$pa6$1@clipper.ens.fr> you write:
>>>>>> Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 11:03:59PM -0700, Jason Merrill wrote:
> >> That would require porting tables to all targets.
> > Yes. Surely you're not suggesting this is an unworthy goal?
>Not at all, just making sure you understand the consequences. :)
> > And probably not so bad if we mothball some of the truely
> > ancient ports at the same time.
>It probably wouldn't hurt to just disable EH on targets that don't support
>the new scheme.
It *does* hurt.
Or are you volunteering to get OpenBSD platforms to handle non-sjlj
exceptions ?
OpenBSD users do need exceptions (heck, I know I do).
We already have quite a few other issues to deal with...
Put simply, killing sjlj without helping us cope means we will be stuck with
gcc 2.95.*.
Not a threat, plain reality.