This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:43:34 -0700
- Cc: bosch at gnat dot com, rth at cygnus dot com, robertl at sco dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <20000426080823Z.mitchell@codesourcery.com><15520.956758717@upchuck>
>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> writes:
>> Jason, would you care to comment as to why the tables make the
>> executable large, even relative to the size bloat introduced by
>> calling setjmp/longjmp all over the place? I'd like to
>> understand this problem better.
Jeffrey> My experience has been that sjlj exceptions bloat things
Jeffrey> more than the tables do.
Thanks for the information.
That lines up with my intuition. I'd be interested if anyone has good
concrete evidence otherwise, or if Jason knows of pathalogical
situations involving the tables.
--
Mark Mitchell mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com