This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: sjlj-exceptions ICE. simplified test case
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at pasanda dot cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Date: 26 Apr 2000 15:34:59 -0000
- CC: mark at codesourcery dot com, bosch at gnat dot com, rth at cygnus dot com, robertl at sco dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 08:18:37 -0600
> From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
>
> My experience has been that sjlj exceptions bloat things more than the
> tables do.
It depends on how much they're used. If every function has a catch
region, range tables will help. However, if there are only a few
catches in your application sjlj exceptions will be smaller. So it
depends; there will be some proportion where they are equal.
Andrew.