This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: cp/inc licensing
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com
- Subject: Re: cp/inc licensing
- From: Mike Stump <mrs at windriver dot com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 12:19:46 -0700
> Many of the C++ run-time support headers (like cp/inc/new) do not
> carry licensing information of any kind. Is that intentional?
No, lazy I think.
> Under what license does this code fall?
libgcc2. If we have reviewed and accepted the libstdc++ v3 mods to
the wording, and it is more appropriate than libgcc2, then it.
I took a glance at the wording in libstdc++ at the top of the gcc
tree, and it appears to be reasonable. I'v not reviewed the current
v3 wording. I have glanced at it, and it was much easier on the eyes
than previous incarnations of it.