This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Possible change to gen* for splits
- To: cpopetz at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: Possible change to gen* for splits
- From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 00 11:43:40 EST
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Actually, since I can do lookahead, how about:
"condition"
"&& reload_completed"
That seems to better reflect the actual relationship of the two conditions.
I guess that works since it would be meaningless were there not a
previous condition, but it seems sort of "odd" to me, though I can't say
exactly why. My concern is in picking a syntax where it's obvious the
is some relation between the two conditions to somebody who might not
have carefully poured through all the documentation.