This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: bounds-check intentionally undocumented?
- To: "John Hughes" <john at Calva dot COM>
- Subject: Re: bounds-check intentionally undocumented?
- From: Greg McGary <gkm at eng dot ascend dot com>
- Date: 06 Jan 2000 07:18:01 -1000
- Cc: <egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <01a501bf5852$28f6f8e0$0e0110ac@britannic.AtlanTech.COM>
"John Hughes" <john@Calva.COM> writes:
> > * Improve optimization: eliminate redundant checks, and make gcc treat
> > auto BPs as register-allocable triples, rather than its current
> > behavior of forcing them (as it does most structs) into stack slots.
>
> Will this optimisation be specific to fat pointers, or available to
> other structs?
Doing it for all structs is the only sensible way to proceed, IMO.