This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: bounds-check intentionally undocumented?
- To: "'Greg McGary'" <gkm at eng dot ascend dot com>
- Subject: RE: bounds-check intentionally undocumented?
- From: "John Hughes" <john at Calva dot COM>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 15:27:26 +0100
- Cc: <egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com>
Greg McGary writes:
> * Improve optimization: eliminate redundant checks, and make gcc treat
> auto BPs as register-allocable triples, rather than its current
> behavior of forcing them (as it does most structs) into stack slots.
Will this optimisation be specific to fat pointers, or available to
other structs?
--
John Hughes <john@Calva.COM>,
CalvaEDI SA. Tel: +33-1-4313-3131
66 rue du Moulin de la Pointe, Fax: +33-1-4313-3139
75013 PARIS.