This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: ... discard qualifiers ...
- To: Geoff Keating <geoffk at envy dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: ... discard qualifiers ...
- From: dlibenzi at maticad dot it (Davide Libenzi)
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 20:24:58 +0100
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- References: <00010313102900.14024@pcdavide> <jmg0wff6w8.fsf@envy.cygnus.com>
On Mon, 03 Jan 2000, Geoff Keating wrote:
> > Perhaps I were not enough clear explaining my problem.
> > I know the syntax difference from 'const void *' to 'void const *' as long as I
>
> You do know that 'const void *' and 'void const *' are the same?
YATE : Yet Another Type Error
==> I know the syntax difference from 'const void *' to 'void * const'
My needs deriving by the test I'm doing about the portability of an old package
written using an -early days of C++ or less strict - compiler.
Since this must lead to a _fast_ evaluation of the package, I'll try to avoid, AFAIC, to edit the code.
The code will sure be modified after the package will be acquired.
Anyway it seems that there aren't any other switches than -fwritable-strings.
Cheers,
Davide.
--
"Debian, the freedom in freedom."