This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Printing types
- To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at mira dot isdn dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de>
- Subject: Re: Printing types
- From: Carlo Wood <carlo at runaway dot xs4all dot nl>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 1999 19:03:22 +0100
- Cc: carlo at runaway dot xs4all dot nl, egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- References: <199910291714.TAA02127@jolan.ppro> <199910292227.AAA00884@mira.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de>
On Sat, Oct 30, 1999 at 12:27:27AM +0200, Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> > Safe the World from confusion.
> > Fix your error messages!
>
> Carlo,
>
[...snip...]
>
> It doesn't harm, either: So if you feel strongly about it, don't try
> to convince others, just go ahead and come up with a patch yourself.
>
> Regards,
> Martin
Hi Martin,
is there anything else wrong with my patch? I noted you still
didn't add it to the CVS repository :). Please let me know:
I *do* feel strongly about this and I offer do any necessary
work to improve the style of printing types. But you have to
let me know why a patch is rejected, if it is.
Regards,
Carlo Wood
PS I will re-submit my patch to gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
together with a ChangeLog entry this time ;).
I'll also add one more space to printing functions
with return type, in this patch (int *func(); became
int*func();).