This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Building a cross-compiler for i586-pc-msdosdjgpp under gcc-2.95.1 fails - followup
- To: Brian Ford <ford at vss dot fsi dot com>
- Subject: Re: Building a cross-compiler for i586-pc-msdosdjgpp under gcc-2.95.1 fails - followup
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Date: 26 Oct 1999 18:42:05 +0200
- Cc: Wes Morgan <morganw at engr dot sc dot edu>,Alex Buell <alex dot buell at tahallah dot demon dot co dot uk>,Mailing List - GCC <egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com>
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9910251441510.6967-100000@eos>
Brian Ford <ford@vss.fsi.com> writes:
|> On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Wes Morgan wrote:
|>
|> > On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Alex Buell wrote:
|> >
|> > > Argh, I'm really sorry to have bothered you all. I had used 'make
|> > > bootstrap' instead of just 'make'.
|> > >
|> > > Sorry.. please ignore what I reported for this thread. I shall drown my
|> > > head in the nearest loo.
|> >
|> > >From the web pages, the last time I checked, to build a cross-compiling
|> > GCC the proper target is 'cross', ala 'make cross'. I assume you also have
|> > the appropriate linker, assembler and friends supporting the
|> > target installed as well.
|> >
|> Nope. gcc >= 2.95 uses just plain old make. "make cross" is now
|> depreciated.
But it's not wrong either, since all that "make cross" does compared to
"make all" is that it passes LANGUAGES="c c++" when building the compiler.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab "And now for something
SuSE Labs completely different."
schwab@suse.de
SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg