This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Building a cross-compiler for i586-pc-msdosdjgpp undergcc-2.95.1fails
- To: N8TM at aol dot com
- Subject: Re: Building a cross-compiler for i586-pc-msdosdjgpp undergcc-2.95.1fails
- From: Alex Buell <alex dot buell at tahallah dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 15:51:03 +0100 (BST)
- cc: Mailing List - GCC <egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com>
- Reply-To: alex dot buell at tahallah dot demon dot co dot uk
On Sun, 24 Oct 1999 N8TM@aol.com wrote:
> I have this problem of not seeing the .h files when running under NT4
> SP[35]. I don't have such a problem when running under W2K beta 3,
> provided that --host and --target are configured correctly, with the
> include files present in the expected locations. W95 has more severe
> problems with includes in the libgcc2 build, where include files may
> be identified but not complete read. Do I get the impression you are
> cross compiling from linux? I trust you have checked Mumit Khan's
> site for any relevant advice. FWIW, when I see this problem, I can
> patch over it by adding additional symlinks to make the .h files show
> up either in /usr/include or in other directories on the search path
> in effect at this point in the build. So it may well be an OS version
> dependent problem.
I thought I had got it wrong, but it's still happening - same place same
error.
What I'm trying to do is to build a cross-compiler for 32bit DOS using
Linux as the host compiler - this is so I can cross-compile my UNIX
sources as a DOS application and test using my DOSEmu - thus no real need
for access to *cough* MSDOS.
I do know my native binutils and gcc are configureed properly. I believe
it's a matter of finding a workaround to get pass the libgcc2 build error.
Thanks for your advice, I shall see if I can get it to work this time.
Cheers,
Alex
--
Legalise cannabis today! Got PGP? Ask me for public key.
http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk - updated!