This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Merging FSFChangeLog
- To: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
- Subject: Re: Merging FSFChangeLog
- From: "Marty Leisner" <leisner at rochester dot rr dot com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:42:31 -0400
- cc: law at cygnus dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, leisner at rochester dot rr dot com
- Reply-to: leisner at rochester dot rr dot com
I really appreciate the ChangeLogs (IMHO -- I try to convince people
I work with this is a good way to do software...nobody likes to listen
to me since they say "we can find this out with sccs" (NOT easily!))
In gcc 2.95, I wanted to see when some behavior was changed...it just
has the ChangeLogs from the last 2 years...(I found better changelogs
in gcc 2.8.1).
while it isn't necessary to include 10 Mbyte+ of changelog in a distribution,
I would appreciate a clear pointer to where I could find complete
changelogs.
Marty Leisner
kenner@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner) writes on Thu, 14 Oct 1999 08:15:3
8 EDT
> No no no. We don't want to do this. If anything those old FSFChang
>eLogs
> will disappear as they become less and less relevant over time.
>
> I think the *complete* change history of any project is always quite
> relevant. I agree that as you go back further and further they are *les
>s*
> important and hence there's little point in spending a lot of time on
> making them fit in particularly well, but discarding *any* such informat
>ion
> is a very bad idea, in my opinion. More than once I've wished the files
> go
> back even *further* than they do because we have no information for the
> first few dozen GCC releases and that's quite unfortunate.