This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Regarding anonymous unions, etc.
- To: Mumit Khan <khan@xraylith.wisc.EDU>
- Subject: Re: Regarding anonymous unions, etc.
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 01:15:26 -0600
- cc: Sam Lantinga <slouken@devolution.com>, Dan Kegel <dank@alumni.caltech.edu>, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
- Reply-To: law@cygnus.com
In message <199909010313.WAA18456@mercury.xraylith.wisc.edu>you write:
> Sam Lantinga <slouken@devolution.com> writes:
> >
> > FYI, the new patches from Mumit Khan, which appear to be integrated
> > into the latest CVS version of gcc/egcs, solve many of our problems
> > with anonymous structures and so forth.
> >
>
> If you're referring to C++ anon aggregates, it's Jason's and it has
> been in the "mainline" for a while now, though not in the release
> branch. If you're referring to C anon aggregates, my patch is certainly
> not integrated; in fact, I don't believe maintainers have yet looked
> at it, and I have yet to see any feedback (other than Richard Henderson's
> initial "Yuk!" reaction to one of the "features" ;-)
Thanks for clarifying. I've been meaning to ask what the status of anon
aggregates was so that I could either zap the patch from my queue or bug
on the C folks to review it.
jeff