This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Testing g77 with LAPACK 3.0
- To: kcm at tca1 dot dl dot ac dot uk
- Subject: Re: Testing g77 with LAPACK 3.0
- From: craig at jcb-sc dot com
- Date: 13 Aug 1999 14:48:03 -0000
- Cc: David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com dot au, egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- Cc: craig at jcb-sc dot com
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.9908131509430.19823-100000@tca1.dl.ac.uk>
>I dont know about the g77 implementation of CMPLX.
Same as F90, according to the docs. (Which are generated from the same
data base from which *some* of the pertinent code is generated, so I'd
expect the docs and compiler to agree.)
So, you're right, I shouldn't just recommend substituting CMPLX(A,B) for
(A,B) in extended FORTRAN 77 code, since (A,B) presumably is DOUBLE
COMPLEX when A or B are DOUBLE PRECISION.
tq vm, (burley)