Re: Building a shared libgcc

[Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com>]

  In message <oremhlbipt.fsf@cupuacu.lsd.dcc.unicamp.br>you write:
  > Wow!  That's cool, but what are we going to do to ensure that
  > libgcc.so is found at run-time?
It is one of the issues we will have to solve.

  > One idea is to build libgcc (and the other run-time libs) with
  > libtool, and arrange that (some subset or equivalent of) libtool is
  > used to link with it.
I'd prefer not to have to fart around with libtool if we can help it; but
ultimately we might have to.

  > Do you see any drawback in the patch for DU that arranges that libgcc
  > is fully copied into libstdc++, besides the fact that it might
  > introduce binary compatibility problems if it was to be reverted?  If
  > this is the only problem with it, we could install it forever, given
  > that it doesn't introduce any problem, and it fixes an IMHO serious
  > existing problem.
I don't want to mess with this. Please, let's not try to solve this problem,
because no matter what we do, it's wrong.

jeff