This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 2.95 does not look in /usr/local/include
- To: hjl at lucon dot org (H.J. Lu)
- Subject: Re: GCC 2.95 does not look in /usr/local/include
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 11:22:28 -0600
- cc: schwab at suse dot de (Andreas Schwab), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
> >
> > Just in case someone wonders why gcc 2.95 does not find their headers in
> > /usr/local/include when prefix != /usr/local I'd suggest to take a look a
> t
> > http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/gcc-patches/1999-07/msg00488.html or
> > http://egcs.cygnus.com/ml/gcc-patches/1999-05/msg00477.html. I won't
> > report this bug a third time, but IMHO it is still enough time to fix it
> > before the release.
> >
>
> I sent a patch many years for Linux to make gcc as the vendor compiler and
> it was accepted. However, egcs didn't have the patch and I sent it again.
> This time I was told egcs wouldn't be used as the vendor compiler and
> someone might even remove my patch from the gcc subdirectory. That might be
> ok since there was gcc 2.7.2.3. Now egcs == gcc. My patch should go in.
>
> Here is the patch again.
We will not accept this patch. It is wrong and evil. Please do not ask us
to install this patch.
jeff