This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: sparc vs lapack
craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
> >However, ISO C9X added all sorts of gnifty complex math functions,
> >and so I have to fix the problem to pass the brand new glibc tests.
>
> Ah, indeed. Might also be worth making sure we DTRT vis-a-vis the
> C++ complex type, whatever that is -- does the ABI consider it a
> complex type, or is it just a class that happens to be implemented
> as a struct with two floats?
It's a template class, _but_ its implementation is implementation-
defined (imagine that :-). The standard only mandates the interface;
an implementation can use a native complex type internally.
> This is getting so complex! ;-)
Yes, it's about time we started thinking about a native
quaternion type, to make things a bit less boring ...
Brane
--
Branko Čibej <branko.cibej@hermes.si>
HERMES SoftLab, Litijska 51, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
voice: (+386 61) 186 53 49 fax: (+386 61) 186 52 70