This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Suggested FAQ entry
- To: Gabriel Dos Reis <Gabriel dot Dos-Reis at cmla dot ens-cachan dot fr>
- Subject: Re: Suggested FAQ entry
- From: Doug Semler <doug at seaspace dot com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 02:05:42 -0700
- cc: egcs-bugs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
- cc: egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
> Doug Semler <doug@seaspace.com> writes:
>
> | This should probably be a FAQ entry, we wasted eight man hours tracking
> | this problem down, and AFAICT it isn't anywhere to be found in the docs or
> | the FAQ, if I missed it, please tell me :)...
> |
> | Problem:
>
> [...]
>
> | Solution:
> | Make sure there exists a definition for all virtual functions
> | declared in the header file - especially the first one declared (and not
> | defined in the class declaration) - even if the functions are never used.
>
> This belongs to C++ per se, not EGCS. Doesn't it?
Why? This is an implementation issue, not a language issue...isn't it?
---
Doug Semler | doug@seaspace.com
SeaSpace Corporation | Garbage In -- Gospel Out
Least Senior Software Developer; | Minister of things to do Next Quarter
Low Man on the Totem Pole | (but will Never Be Done) DNRC O-
A closed mind is a terrible thing | Bus Error (passengers dumped)
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/M d---(pu) s++:- a-- C++ UILSH+++$ P--- L++ E--- W+
N++ o-- K? w--(++$) O- M-- V- PS+ !PE Y PGP t(+) 5+++ X+
R- tv+(-) b+(++) DI++++ D G e++>++++ h!>--- r% y+>+++++**
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------