This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: another silly optimisation case
- To: weejock at ferret dot lmh dot ox dot ac dot uk (Matthew Kirkwood)
- Subject: Re: another silly optimisation case
- From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 18:47:34 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
> Hi,
>
> egcs RH5.2 (egcs-2.90.27 980315 (egcs-1.0.2 release))
> generates different code for these two functions, the
> first including a jump even with -O6:
>
> int f(int g) { return g ? 34 : 0; }
>
> int g(int f) { return f && 34; }
>
> I don't suppose (x ? y : 0) is a hugely common construction
> but it seems to be another candidate for simple optimisation.
>
> Am I missing something about what the standard says about
> these two operators?
f (1) returns 34.
g (1) returns 1.